Jumping to conclusions in delusional and non‐delusional schizophrenic patients

Abstract

Objective. Several studies have provided evidence for the claim that a subgroup of (schizophrenic) patients with current delusions share a jumping to conclusions ( JTC) bias. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate whether currently deluded and non-deluded schizophrenic patients perform differently on three tasks tapping probabilistic reasoning. Method.Probabilistic reasoning was assessed in 31 schizophrenic patients, 28 psychiatric controls, and 17 healthy controls. In addition to the traditional draws to decision procedure, we employed two tasks for which participants had to judge, at each stage, the likelihood that beads come from either container (graded estimates procedure). Reaction times were recorded for the graded estimates procedure.Results. A JTC bias was displayed by 42% of the schizophrenic patients in the draws to decision condition, while 7% of the psychiatric patients and none of the healthy controls reached a decision after only one bead. A similar pattern of results was observed for the graded estimates procedure. This bias was more pronounced in deluded schizophrenic patients, although currently non-deluded patients also showed evidence for earlier decisions. A bias to over-adjust when confronted with potentially disconfirmatory evidence was confined to deluded schizophrenic participants. There was also evidence for an increase in JTC in the deluded group over the course of the tasks. No substantial group differences occurred with respect to reaction time parameters indicating that results are not attributable to impulsivity.Discussion. The findings provide further evidence for state and trait characteristics of abnormal reasoning in paranoid schizophrenia. Results are discussed in light of several competing explanations for JTC in schizophrenia.In 1986, Hemsley and Garety put forward the hypothesis that deluded patients may share abnormalities in logical inference. Specifically, a jumping to conclusions ( JTC)

Correlates to Relapse as Perceived by Schizophrenic Patients

“…This finding was in the same line with Moritz and Woodward, [12]; and Chabungbam, Avashti, and Sharan, [8]; and Chaurotia, Verma, and Baniya [10]. This finding may be due to mental illness is usually result in impaired communication and consequently lead to impaired social interaction.…”

Failing to self-ascribe thought and motion: Towards a three-factor account of passivity symptoms in schizophrenia

“…For reasons beyond the scope of this paper, I do not think that the maintenance of delusional hypothesis can be given a similar 'rational' account given the tendency of delusional schizophrenics to adopt beliefs on the basis of minimal positive evidence (see e.g. Langdon et al, 2010;Moritz and Woodward, 2005;Colbert and Peters, 2002;Young and Bentall, 1997;Garety et al, 1991;Huq et al, 1988).…”

Healthy people with delusional ideation change their mind with conviction

“…They found that patients showed a tendency to jump to new conclusions, as deluded schizophrenia patients strongly reacted to disconfirmatory evidence compared to controls. In a similar paradigm, Moritz and Woodward (2005) reported that schizophrenia patients were more swayed by evidence that contradicts their first conclusion. Indeed, delusional schizophrenia patients were more likely than nondelusional psychiatric controls and non-patients to reduce their level of certainty when presented with disconfirmatory evidence.…”