2021
DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jumping to conclusions: Implications for reasoning errors, false belief, knowledge corruption, and impeded learning.

Abstract: In schizophrenia research, patients who “jump to conclusions” in probabilistic reasoning tasks tend to display impaired decision-making and delusional belief. In five studies, we examined whether jumping to conclusions (JTC) was similarly associated with decision impairments in a nonclinical sample, such as reasoning errors, false belief, overconfidence, and diminished learning. In Studies 1a and 1b, JTC was associated with errors stimulated by automatic reasoning, oddball beliefs such as conspiracy theories, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Belief in SARS-CoV-2 conspiracy theories was also (positively) associated with several reasoning biases, including illusory pattern perception and denominator neglect. While these biases were not identified as possible causes of conspiracist ideation by GFCI, previous literature providing evidence of a causal relation between these variables [47] , [56] , [62] suggests that additional exploration of the role of these biases may be warranted. Belief in SARS-COV-2 conspiracy theories was also positively associated with persecutory ideation (which GFCI suggested was causally upstream of belief in conspiracy theories) and negatively associated with epistemic trust in scientists (which GFCI suggested was reduced by belief in SARS-CoV-2 conspiracy theories).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Belief in SARS-CoV-2 conspiracy theories was also (positively) associated with several reasoning biases, including illusory pattern perception and denominator neglect. While these biases were not identified as possible causes of conspiracist ideation by GFCI, previous literature providing evidence of a causal relation between these variables [47] , [56] , [62] suggests that additional exploration of the role of these biases may be warranted. Belief in SARS-COV-2 conspiracy theories was also positively associated with persecutory ideation (which GFCI suggested was causally upstream of belief in conspiracy theories) and negatively associated with epistemic trust in scientists (which GFCI suggested was reduced by belief in SARS-CoV-2 conspiracy theories).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, in three cases Urn B had more red balls (a higher numerator) but offered poorer odds of winning than Urn A. As in previous work [47] , denominator neglect was calculated by averaging participants’ preference ratings across these three cases. Scores range from 1 to 7.…”
Section: Task-based Measures Of Reasoning Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering JTC, there may be a negative relationship between functional outcomes and recovery. Such conflicting relationships may be related to subjective overestimation ( Sanchez and Dunning, 2020 ). For instance, the person with schizophrenia is prone to over- or underestimation ( Silberstein et al, 2018 ; Silberstein and Harvey, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pandemic has also appeared to have given rise to unusual beliefs regarding the origins of COVID-19, sometimes referred to as “conspiracy theories,” which have been identified as a potential coping mechanism ( Fountoulakis et al, 2020 ). It has been hypothesized that such beliefs may lie on the psychosis continuum, and may be rooted in similar errors in cognitive processes ( Freeman, 2007 ; Sanchez and Dunning, 2020 ). However, there have been few large-scale studies to examine the wide range of COVID-19 dimensions and their effects on psychotic experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%