2019
DOI: 10.1080/01650521.2019.1629174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) in agroecosystems: a case study to know how friendly some crops can be for native fauna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, diversity in native shade trees can augment the presence of functional groups within the tea matrix (; Brady et al, 2011; Mudappa et al, 2014: p. 184; Moonen & Bàrberi, 2008) by providing additional support as refugia or as movement pathways by reducing canopy gaps (Vasudev & Fletcher, 2015), thus rendering the matrix more functional than just being a superficial green cover for some species. In fact, a diversity of native trees scattered within monoculture plantations has an enhanced positive effect on multiple groups of wildlife such as assemblages of bird guilds, bats, and certain soil arthropods (Marsden et al, 2020) such as spiders (Le Roux et al, 2018; Rubio et al, 2019) that are well‐known natural predators of tea pests (Raychaudhuri et al, 2016; Yinfang, 2004). Mammals such as leopards, elephants and other species who may be passive users of the tea landscape have shown to prefer higher density of ground cover (Kshettry et al, 2017; Mudappa et al, 2012; Yashmita‐Ulman et al, 2021) to avoid human interaction during movement between forest patches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, diversity in native shade trees can augment the presence of functional groups within the tea matrix (; Brady et al, 2011; Mudappa et al, 2014: p. 184; Moonen & Bàrberi, 2008) by providing additional support as refugia or as movement pathways by reducing canopy gaps (Vasudev & Fletcher, 2015), thus rendering the matrix more functional than just being a superficial green cover for some species. In fact, a diversity of native trees scattered within monoculture plantations has an enhanced positive effect on multiple groups of wildlife such as assemblages of bird guilds, bats, and certain soil arthropods (Marsden et al, 2020) such as spiders (Le Roux et al, 2018; Rubio et al, 2019) that are well‐known natural predators of tea pests (Raychaudhuri et al, 2016; Yinfang, 2004). Mammals such as leopards, elephants and other species who may be passive users of the tea landscape have shown to prefer higher density of ground cover (Kshettry et al, 2017; Mudappa et al, 2012; Yashmita‐Ulman et al, 2021) to avoid human interaction during movement between forest patches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tea-dominated landscapes can support many forest-associated bat and bird species because they contain forest fragments and shaded areas ( Imboma et al, 2020 ). As part of a fragmented landscape, yerba mate and tea are perennial agroecosystems that provide habitat continuity for diverse arthropods ( Rubio et al, 2019 ). In a previous study, suitable habitats for tea plant cultivation and areas where these habitats overlap with the Asian elephant distribution to balance the conflict between the expansion of tea plantations and the spatial needs of wildlife in southwestern China were identified ( Dai, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Batesian mimicry provides protection for Myrmarachne so they are able to have a wild habitat in the field [29]. Myrmarachne occupy a wide range of terrestrial habitats, including rainforests, shrubs, plants, grasses, fields, and even some man-made habitats [30][31][32][33]. Myrmarachne can, therefore, come into direct contact with ETOH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%