Jump Training in Rugby Union Players: Barbell or Hexagonal Bar?

Abstract

Weakley, JJS, Till, K, Read, DB, Leduc, C, Roe, GAB, Phibbs, PJ, Darrall-Jones, J, and Jones, B. Jump training in rugby union players: barbell or hexagonal bar?. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2018-The countermovement jump (CMJ) is an exercise that can develop athletic performance. Using the conventional barbell (BAR) and hexagonal barbell (HEX) while jumping, the intensity can be increased. However, the bar that provides greater adaptations is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to assess changes in loaded and unloaded CMJ with either a BAR or HEX across a 4-week mesocycle in rugby union players. Twenty-nine subjects were strength-matched and randomized into 2 groups. Subjects completed 3 sets of CMJ at 20% of 1 repetition maximum back squat, 3 times per week for 4 weeks, using either a BAR or HEX. Subjects completed an unloaded CMJ on a force plate before and after, whereas the highest peak concentric velocity during the jump squat was recorded in the first and last training sessions using a linear position transducer. Magnitude-based inferences assessed meaningful changes within- and between-groups. Possibly greater improvements in unloaded CMJ were found in the HEX group in jump height (effect size ± 90% confidence intervals: 0.27 ± 0.27), relative peak (0.21 ± 0.23), and mean power (0.32 ± 0.36). In addition, likely to very likely greater improvements were observed in the HEX group in peak velocity (0.33 ± 0.27), relative mean power (0.53 ± 0.30), mean force (0.47 ± 0.27), and 100-ms impulse (0.60 ± 0.48). Similar raw changes in jump squat peak velocity occurred (0.20-0.25 m·s), despite the likely greater ES occurring with the BAR (0.32 ± 0.26). These results indicate that training with the HEX leads to superior unloaded CMJ adaptations. In addition, practitioners should use either the HEX or BAR when aiming to enhance loaded jump ability.

The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review

“…Furthermore, a number of these studies have been done within a Smith machine which is expected to increase the reliability of the outputs. However, strength and conditioning practitioners often utilise a wide range of exercises and these are often done with free weights [73][74][75][76]. Additionally,…”

The Effects of Augmented Feedback on Sprint, Jump, and Strength Adaptations in Rugby Union Players After a 4-Week Training Program

“…Table 1 outlines the strength and conditioning training protocols that all subjects undertook across the four-week mesocycle. The resistance training exercises and sessions prescribed were part of the regular preseason routine and were based upon previous research 8,21 . There were two different training routines (session one and session two) and these were completed in an alternating order so that each individual session was completed six times.…”

Velocity Loss Thresholds Reliably Control Kinetic and Kinematic Outputs during Free Weight Resistance Training

“…This suggests that by utilizing VLTs, practitioners can prescribe each individual athlete a similar training stimulus irrespective of recent training history. This is made possible by emphasizing the external stimulus (i.e., force, power, and velocity), rather than set and repetition schemes that do not account for athlete differences [ 33 , 34 , 35 ] and have been shown to cause divergent adaptations despite homogenous groups of athletes [ 36 ]. This supports previous work from Weakley et al that demonstrated that VLTs control for differences (e.g., strength and muscular endurance) between participants and allow for homogenous training outputs within training sessions [ 11 ].…”