Jugement éthique dans le processus de décision d’un agent BDI

Cointe, Nicolas; Bonnet, Grégory; Boissier, Olivier

doi:10.3166/ria.31.471-499

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some scenarios include other 'characters', such as criminals, pregnant women, or doctors. 6 vehicles; see, for example, Allen et al [2], Wallach and Allen [102], Pereira and Saptawijaya [84], Pereira and Saptawijaya [83], Berreby et al [15], Danielson [33], Lin [68], Malle et al [73], Saptawijaya and Pereira [89], Saptawijaya and Pereira [90], Bentzen [14], Bhargava and Kim [16], Casey [26], Cointe et al [29], Greene [48], Lindner et al [69], Santoni de Sio [88], Welsh [103], Wintersberger [104], Bjørgen et al [17], Grinbaum [51], Misselhorn [75], Pardo [82], Sommaggio and Marchiori [93], Baum et al [13], Cunneen et al [31], Krylov et al [63], Sans and Casacuberta [87], Wright [105], Agrawal et al [1], Agrawal et al [9], Banks [11], Bauer [12], Etienne [40], Gordon [46], Harris [52], Lindner et al [70], Nallur [77]. And, several more articles that discuss trolley problems without citing Foot; e.g., Bonnefon et al [20], Etzioni and Etzioni [41], Lim and Taeihagh [67], Evans et al…”

Section: The Moral Machine Experimentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Moral dilemmas for moral machines

LaCroix

2022

AI Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Autonomous systems are being developed and deployed in situations that may require some degree of ethical decision-making ability. As a result, research in machine ethics has proliferated in recent years. This work has included using moral dilemmas as validation mechanisms for implementing decision-making algorithms in ethically-loaded situations. Using trolley-style problems in the context of autonomous vehicles as a case study, I argue (1) that this is a misapplication of philosophical thought experiments because (2) it fails to appreciate the purpose of moral dilemmas, and (3) this has potentially catastrophic consequences; however, (4) there are uses of moral dilemmas in machine ethics that are appropriate and the novel situations that arise in a machine-learning context can shed some light on philosophical work in ethics.

show abstract

Section: The Moral Machine Experimentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Moral dilemmas for moral machines

LaCroix

2022

AI Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The error of reasoning arises from the implication that since people say they would act in this way (a descriptive claim), it follows that the machine ought to act in this way (a normative claim). 10 See, for example, (Allen et al, 2011;Wallach and Allen, 2009;Saptawijaya, 2015, 2011;Berreby et al, 2015;Danielson, 2015;Lin, 2015;Malle et al, 2015;Pereira, 2015, 2016;Bentzen, 2016;Bhargava and Kim, 2017;Casey, 2017;Cointe et al, 2017;Greene, 2017;Lindner et al, 2017;Santoni de Sio, 2017;Welsh, 2017;Wintersberger et al, 2017;Bjørgen et al, 2018;Grinbaum, 2018;Misselhorn, 2018;Pardo, 2018;Sommaggio and Marchiori, 2018;Baum et al, 2019;Cunneen et al, 2019;Krylov et al, 2019;Sans and Casacuberta, 2019;Wright, 2019;Agrawal et al, 2020;Awad et al, 2020;Banks, 2021;Bauer, 2020;Etienne, 2020;Gordon, 2020;Harris, 2020;Lindner et al, 2020;Nallur, 2020).…”

Section: Moral Benchmarks For Ai Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics

LaCroix¹,

Luccioni²

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research and have been developed for a variety of tasks ranging from question answering to facial recognition. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. In this paper, drawing upon research in moral philosophy and metaethics, we argue that it is impossible to develop such a benchmark. As such, alternative mechanisms are necessary for evaluating whether an AI system is 'ethical'. This is especially pressing in light of the prevalence of applied, industrial AI research. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' (and 'value alignment') rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems. We further highlight that, because values are unambiguously relative, focusing on values forces us to consider explicitly what the values are and whose values they are. Shifting the emphasis from ethics to values therefore gives rise to several new ways of understanding how researchers might advance research programmes for robustly safe or beneficial AI. We conclude by highlighting a number of possible ways forward for the field as a whole, and we advocate for different approaches towards more value-aligned AI research.

show abstract

Du comportement moral des agents autonomes et artificiels. Quelles réflexions éthiques au sein des systèmes sociotechniques ?

Boissier

2019

RIMHE : Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme &Amp; Entreprise

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Jugement éthique dans le processus de décision d’un agent BDI

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Moral dilemmas for moral machines

Moral dilemmas for moral machines

Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics

Du comportement moral des agents autonomes et artificiels. Quelles réflexions éthiques au sein des systèmes sociotechniques ?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About