2014
DOI: 10.5935/0103-1104.20140008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judicialization of health and public hearing convened by the Supreme Court in 2009: what has changed since then?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey conducted in the SES/SP between 2010 and 2014 indicated an increase of approximately 63% in the number of lawsuits demanding the provision of health-related products, primarily medications. Although this increase follows an increase in the number of lawsuits at the federal level [ 14 , 26 ], it has not been observed in other states such as Rio Grande do Sul [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The survey conducted in the SES/SP between 2010 and 2014 indicated an increase of approximately 63% in the number of lawsuits demanding the provision of health-related products, primarily medications. Although this increase follows an increase in the number of lawsuits at the federal level [ 14 , 26 ], it has not been observed in other states such as Rio Grande do Sul [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis that the number of lawsuits increased because of the limited incorporation of new medicines into the SUS is a misconception when we consider that despite the changes in the policy of technological incorporation within the SUS with the creation of Conitec [ 15 ], which made the analysis and incorporation of new technologies into the SUS more transparent, responsive, and democratic [ 14 ], the number of lawsuits continues to increase in Brazil. Therefore, the argument that the increase in the number of lawsuits is often attributed to the failed or delayed incorporation of new technologies into the SUS is unjustified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ademais, essa lei dispõe que a Poder Judiciário tem determinado ações à administração pública para fornecimento de serviços ou tecnologias em saúde, quando estes não se encontram disponíveis no SUS.Em Minas Gerais, entre 1999 a 2009, 36,4% dos procedimentos demandados judicialmente se referiam à solicitação do SIC(GOMES et al, 2014b) De 2009(GOMES et al, 2014a). Ademais se observa que as ações judiciais em saúde contra a União vêm crescendo paulatinamente: 10.486 casos novos em 2009, 11.203 em 2010, 12.811 em 2011 e 13.051 em 2012(GOMES et al, 2014a).…”
unclassified