Judicial Protection of Civil Rights in Ukraine: National Experience through the Prism of European Standards

Abstract

The relevance of the academic study of the problems of judicial protection of civil rights is conditioned by the ongoing judicial reform in Ukraine, which has identified new priorities in this area, since in 2016, the legislator provided the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court with effective instruments for the protection and restoration of violated or unrecognized rights. The purpose of this study is to systematically examine the organizational and procedural aspects of the Institute for the Judicial Protection of Subjective Civil Rights and the Law of Interest in Ukraine, to determine the content of this institution and its development trends based on the results of the 2016 judicial reform. To achieve this purpose, both methods of doctrinal analysis (systemic, structural, functional, hermeneutic) and tools of empirical research (statistical, method of critical analysis of judicial precedents) were applied. As a result, the author's original vision of the issue of judicial protection of subjective civil rights and interests protected by law has been formulated.

Hacker Attacks on Electronic Election and Vote Counting Systems: Estimation of Damages and Methods of Protection

“…According to the election commission, the systems affected by the GEFEST 3.0 malware included file servers and email servers. This also affected the availability of the voter register and the database of civil servants used to appoint election commissions (Borysova et al, 2019;Van der Staak & Wolf, 2019).…”

Status and prospects of improvement of health care in Ukraine: Legal aspects

“…As a result, the effectiveness of today's health care sector has the worst indicators for the entire period of Ukraine's independence. It is known that the effectiveness of the health care sector is related to the lev-el of life expectancy of the country's population (Borysova et al, 2019;Sarana et al, 2019;). All methods of assessment of measures aimed at preserving and restoring physiological and psychological functions, optimal working capacity, and social activity of a person at the maximum biologically possible individual life span are based to one degree or another on the life expectancy indicator.…”

Criminological Effectiveness of the Astrent as a Legal Incentive for Judgment Enforcement

“…An effective method of protection should be considered one the application of which leads to actual restoration of the infringed right (ensures that it is no longer unrecognised or disputed) or stops the inability to satisfy the interest and, if this is not possible, ensures that appropriate redress is obtained (Borysova et al, 2019). Moreover, the current practice of the SC makes the effectiveness partly dependent on the existence of an enforcement mechanism for the court's decision (Resolution No.…”