Abstract:This article analyzes the puzzling case of Peru, a country highlighted as an example of the internationalization of sexual and reproductive health and rights norms through supranational litigation, but where these legal victories have not prompted an expansion of abortion rights. Through the analysis of three judicial cases, with a focus on the legal arguments and strategies, the article argues that two features of the abortion legal mobilization in Peru are key to understand the lack of more positive developm… Show more
“…This jurisprudence reflects a key characteristic of the Peruvian Constitutional Court: a formalistic approach that limits the ability of the judiciary to innovate and develop jurisprudence. This feature has been pointed out as a major limitation towards expanding the grounds for rights in general [50] through litigation at the national level.…”
Section: Judicial Protection and Enforcement Of Water Rightsmentioning
In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.
“…This jurisprudence reflects a key characteristic of the Peruvian Constitutional Court: a formalistic approach that limits the ability of the judiciary to innovate and develop jurisprudence. This feature has been pointed out as a major limitation towards expanding the grounds for rights in general [50] through litigation at the national level.…”
Section: Judicial Protection and Enforcement Of Water Rightsmentioning
In this paper we compare recent efforts towards the constitutionalization of the right to water in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru to understand the opportunities and limitations related to the attempts to enhance access to piped water to the highest normative level. Peru passed a constitutional amendment in 2017 while Brazil and Colombia have seen much right-to-water activism but have not succeeded in passing such reforms. We explore the role of the existing domestic legal frameworks on drinkable water provision and water management towards the approval of constitutional amendments. We find that all three countries have specialized laws, water governing institutions, and constitutional jurisprudence connecting access to water with rights, but the legal opportunity structures to enforce socio-economic rights vary; they are stronger in Colombia and Brazil, and weaker in Peru. We argue that legal opportunity structures build legal environments that influence constitutional reform success. Legal opportunity structures act as incentives both for social movements to push for reforms and for actors with legislative power to accept or reject them. Our findings also show that in some contexts political cost is a key element of constitutional reforms that enshrine the right to water; therefore, this is an element that should be considered when analyzing these processes.
“…Existen en nuestro país muchos vacíos legales en lo que respecta a la protección integral de la salud de las personas con enfermedades genéticas (1), así como el resguardo de la vida desde la fertilización (2).…”
Resumen: El artículo expone conceptos actuales biológicos, así como algunos planteamientos filosóficos acerca del inicio de la vida, que se examinarán en relación con la necesidad del aborto eugenésico. Se presenta el concepto de "exdurantismo", en el que la combinación del nuevo genoma nuclear y mitocondrial hacen único al individuo; además, se concibe al complejo genómico como "integrador somático" que dirige el desarrollo embrionario, y se muestra la problemática en el caso de las violaciones que provocan embarazos, el aborto eugenésico en enfermedades genéticas incapacitantes o la utilización de embriones posterior a la fertilización in-vitro.Se plantea que la dignidad de la persona comienza desde la concepción. Frente a la detección de una enfermedad genética, grave o letal, se debe ofrecer soporte económico y social, de diagnóstico y tratamiento; además, desde la salud pública, una mayor inversión para plantear estrategias de tamizaje, diagnóstico, manejo e investigación.Palabras clave: aborto eugenésico, comienzo de la vida humana, fertilización in-vitro, embrión de mamíferos, enfermedades genéticas congénitas
Ethical and scientific considerations of the beginning of life on eugenic abortion in disabling genetic diseases in Peru
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.