2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4199122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judicial Decision-Making. A Survey of the Experimental Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 119 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Berryessa et al (2022) argue that judges—like all people—are vulnerable to subconscious biases that can influence their decision‐making, and other researchers have demonstrated that judges do indeed display various well‐known cognitive biases (e.g. anchoring, framing, hindsight; Engel, 2022). Underscoring this point, a recent survey found that most criminal defence attorneys (83.5%) and most prosecutors (56%) believe bench trials to be less fair than jury trials (Diamond & Salerno, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berryessa et al (2022) argue that judges—like all people—are vulnerable to subconscious biases that can influence their decision‐making, and other researchers have demonstrated that judges do indeed display various well‐known cognitive biases (e.g. anchoring, framing, hindsight; Engel, 2022). Underscoring this point, a recent survey found that most criminal defence attorneys (83.5%) and most prosecutors (56%) believe bench trials to be less fair than jury trials (Diamond & Salerno, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%