2018
DOI: 10.1177/0022429418765482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judgmental Standard Setting: The Development of Objective Content and Performance Standards for Secondary-Level Solo Instrumental Music Assessment

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to describe the development of content and performance standards for a rubric to evaluate secondary-level solo instrumental music performance using a modified bookmark standard setting procedure. The research questions that guided this study include (1) What are the psychometric qualities of a rubric to evaluate secondary-level solo instrumental music performance? (2) What is the quality of ratings obtained for the standard-setting panel of subject matter expert judges? (3) What c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytical criteria would be the basis here, rather than the fairly holistic criteria, with place for a variety of interpretations, that can be said to take precedence today. This type of homogeneous proficiency test has been advocated in previous research and proved effective and reliable (Bergee, 2003;Wesolowski et al, 2018). Furthermore, the joint development of a combination of verbalised and instantiated standard for approval suggested by Sadler (2014) could provide the necessary "tuning" and harmonisation of an assessment culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Analytical criteria would be the basis here, rather than the fairly holistic criteria, with place for a variety of interpretations, that can be said to take precedence today. This type of homogeneous proficiency test has been advocated in previous research and proved effective and reliable (Bergee, 2003;Wesolowski et al, 2018). Furthermore, the joint development of a combination of verbalised and instantiated standard for approval suggested by Sadler (2014) could provide the necessary "tuning" and harmonisation of an assessment culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Analytical criteria would be the basis here, rather than the fairly holistic criteria, with place for a variety of interpretations, that can be said to take precedence today. This type of homogeneous proficiency test has been advocated in previous research and proved effective and reliable Wesolowski et al, 2018). Furthermore, the joint development of a combination of verbalised and instantiated standard for approval suggested by Sadler (2014) could provide the necessary "tuning" and harmonisation of an assessment culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rubric was developed and the psychometric qualities (i.e., validity and reliability) were tested using the MFR-PC model. The rubric was further tested in the context of a judgmental standard setting procedure (Wesolowski, et al, 2018). The rubric was uploaded into electronic format (Google Forms) and each rater completed one form per student evaluated in real time of the performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%