2018
DOI: 10.1017/jlr.2018.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judging Religion and Judges' Religions

Abstract: In liberal democracies with religiously diverse populations, it would be surprising and troubling if a judge relied on a religious text or precept to resolve a legal dispute. It would deeply offend principles of religious freedom if individuals were bound by judicial pronouncement to obey the dictates of a faith they do not share. However, some commentators have long claimed that a person's cultural worldview has an impact on the way they interpret laws and facts, and there is some empirical support for this c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main data were Religious Court decisions on divorce initiated by wives in the Padang Religious Court. The legal reasons and beliefs used by the Religious Court to decide cases must be thoroughly understood (Kislowicz, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main data were Religious Court decisions on divorce initiated by wives in the Padang Religious Court. The legal reasons and beliefs used by the Religious Court to decide cases must be thoroughly understood (Kislowicz, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research in the United States has underscored the extent to which religion has exerted an influence on the legal system through judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and defendants (Bornstein and Miller 2009;Kislowicz 2018;Shahshahani and Liu 2017;Miller and Bronstein 2006;Henson 2001;Reza 1999). While religion's influence on all of these legal system stakeholders is important, its influence on juries and jurors is perhaps most significant symbolically, substantively, and pragmatically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%