2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judging emotional congruency: Explicit attention to situational context modulates processing of facial expressions of emotion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
68
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
13
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has shown greater N170 responses to targets preceded by affectively congruent compared to incongruent primes (Hietanen and Astikainen, 2013; Hinojosa et al, 2015). A plausible explanation is that the enhanced N170 in response to affectively congruent vs. incongruent pairs may reflect the integrative activation of affective valence by the contexts (primes) and the target stimuli, and the effect of this activation on visual processing (Hietanen and Astikainen, 2013; Diéguez-Risco et al, 2015). Thus, the N170 modulation indicates that direct gaze is affectively more congruent with positive words than closed eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research has shown greater N170 responses to targets preceded by affectively congruent compared to incongruent primes (Hietanen and Astikainen, 2013; Hinojosa et al, 2015). A plausible explanation is that the enhanced N170 in response to affectively congruent vs. incongruent pairs may reflect the integrative activation of affective valence by the contexts (primes) and the target stimuli, and the effect of this activation on visual processing (Hietanen and Astikainen, 2013; Diéguez-Risco et al, 2015). Thus, the N170 modulation indicates that direct gaze is affectively more congruent with positive words than closed eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have repeatedly reported that the LPP is modulated by affective congruence between the targets and preceding contexts, with affectively incongruent targets eliciting larger LPP amplitudes compared to affectively congruent targets (Werheid et al, 2005; Zhang et al, 2010; Herring et al, 2011; Hietanen and Astikainen, 2013). An enhanced LPP in response to affectively incongruent targets is interpreted as reflecting increased attentional resource allocation when the targets are unexpected or do not affectively match the preceding primes (Werheid et al, 2005; Zhang et al, 2010; Diéguez-Risco et al, 2015). Thus, the present LPP result indicates that direct gaze is affectively more incongruent with negative words compared with closed eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 also identified larger Late Positive Potentials (LPP) when subjects viewed pleasant and unpleasant pictures compared with neutral pictures. Researchers have also utilized facial expression pictures (happy and angry faces) as stimuli, and early brain electrical components (e.g., N170 and P1) were observed during the experiments 1214 . Other studies have indicated that Late Positive Components (LPC, e.g., P300 and LPP) were produced when affective facial pictures were presented 1519 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The engaged network of activated regions was found to peak at later time points (i.e., TR 5), in addition we identified slower response times for congruent conditions, indicative of the need for greater cognitive engagement (Theeuwes et al, 2000). Slower response times for congruency with prior expectations have been reported previously in the literature (Dieguez-Risco et al, 2015), particularly for stimuli that carry greater uncertainty and require evaluation of congruency. It is argued that when asked to judge emotional congruency in dynamic displays of emotion there is initially higher uncertainty because the emotional expression may suddenly change, and therefore the evaluator takes longer than when judging emotional incongruency, which is immediately evident to differ from the emotional cue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Social situations can rapidly change, requiring a fluid and adaptable system able to recognize and predict another's emotions (Palermo and Rhodes, 2007). Neuroimaging studies have found that recognition of emotion is influenced by 'prior expectations' about which emotions are likely to arise in certain contexts (Barbalat et al, 2013;Dieguez-Risco et al, 2015); however, the behavioural and neural influences of prior expectations on perception have been examined using static representations of emotion. Static images only represent a single facial pattern within a single modality and fail to capture the dynamic complexity of emotion perception relevant in everyday life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%