2017
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/j3htp
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judgements about double-embedded relative clauses differ between languages

Abstract: When the middle verb phrase is removed from an English double-embedded sentence, the remainder of the sentence is read faster in spite of the ungrammaticality. It has been shown that this "missing-VP effect" is reversed in German and Dutch. The current study demonstrates that the same cross-linguistic difference holds for sentences judgments: Native speakers consider English double-embedded sentences more comprehensible and acceptable when the middle verb phrase is removed, whereas the same is not the case in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also show that the use of prepositions in relative clauses in object position except accusative case may pose a problem for second language learners owing to the possible effect of first language. Other researchers also mentioned the difficulties of acquisition of relative clauses in object position since these constructions are often studied hierarchically (Comrie, 1989;Frank and Ernst, 2018;Gibson, 1998;Hamilton, 1995;Kayne, 1994;Keenan and Comrie, 1977;O'Grady, 2011;Thornton, 2016;Wu, Kaiser and Vasishth, 2018). The findings of these studies are in parallel with this study because prepositions affect the processing of relative clauses in object relative clauses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study also show that the use of prepositions in relative clauses in object position except accusative case may pose a problem for second language learners owing to the possible effect of first language. Other researchers also mentioned the difficulties of acquisition of relative clauses in object position since these constructions are often studied hierarchically (Comrie, 1989;Frank and Ernst, 2018;Gibson, 1998;Hamilton, 1995;Kayne, 1994;Keenan and Comrie, 1977;O'Grady, 2011;Thornton, 2016;Wu, Kaiser and Vasishth, 2018). The findings of these studies are in parallel with this study because prepositions affect the processing of relative clauses in object relative clauses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, different theories have been suggested regarding the acquisition of relative clause constructions. The acquisition of relative clauses, which were previously studied theoretically and typologically, still remains a mystery (Andrews, 2007;Chomsky, 1965;Comrie, 1989;Diessel, 2004;Downing, 1978;Duarte et al, 2015;Frank and Ernst, 2018;Gibson, 1998;* Dr. Öğretim Üyesi, Syracuse Üniversitesi, Dil Bilim Bölümü, eserordem@gmail.com Hamilton, 1995;Kayne, 1994;Keenan and Comrie, 1977;O'Grady, 2011;Thornton, 2016;Wu, Kaiser and Vasishth, 2018;Wiechmann, 2015). Larsen-Freeman's (1997) complexity theory can also show why certain structures are harder to process, understand and produce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…German materials are shown in the sentences (4); these are word‐for‐word translations of the English materials in (3). Vasishth et al () probed the structural forgetting effect using reading times for material after the end of the verb phrases, and Frank and Ernst () have replicated the effect using acceptability judgments (but see Bader, ; Häussler & Bader, , for complicating evidence).…”
Section: Structural Forgettingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models use recurrent neural networks with some fixed number of neurons, which can be understood as a specific kind of constrained memory. A case in point is the observation that forgetting effects in nested head-final dependencies are reduced or absent in head-final structures (Vasishth et al, 2010;Frank et al, 2015b;Frank and Ernst, 2019), which has been modeled using connectionist models (Engelmann and Vasishth, 2009;Frank et al, 2015b), which can be interpreted as modeling surprisal conditioned on imperfect memory (Futrell et al, 2020b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%