2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-017-1095-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judgement bias in pigs is independent of performance in a spatial holeboard task and conditional discrimination learning

Abstract: Biases in judgement of ambiguous stimuli, as measured in a judgement bias task, have been proposed as a measure of the valence of affective states in animals. We recently suggested a list of criteria for behavioural tests of emotion, one of them stating that responses on the task used to assess emotionality should not be confounded by, among others, differences in learning capacity, i.e. must not simply reflect the cognitive capacity of an animal. We performed three independent studies in which pigs acquired a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(118 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Why individual optimism may correlate with one facet of associative learning but not another is an unanswered question. To date, only a few studies have examined covariation between performance in discriminative learning and judgement biases [61,84] and have mostly reported no association between these two cognitive traits, similar to our results. However, to the best of our knowledge, links between judgement biases and reversal learning have not previously been empirically investigated.…”
Section: (C) Covariation Between Learning Performance and Judgement Biassupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Why individual optimism may correlate with one facet of associative learning but not another is an unanswered question. To date, only a few studies have examined covariation between performance in discriminative learning and judgement biases [61,84] and have mostly reported no association between these two cognitive traits, similar to our results. However, to the best of our knowledge, links between judgement biases and reversal learning have not previously been empirically investigated.…”
Section: (C) Covariation Between Learning Performance and Judgement Biassupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Cognitive development of LBW pigs has been assessed using measures of spatial learning ( 17 19 , 22 ) and associative learning ( 20 , 21 ). Spatial learning in a holeboard task and associative learning in a conditional discrimination task have previously been found to be independent measures of cognition in pigs ( 53 ). Perhaps no effects of LBW were found in associative learning studies with pigs because they assessed a cognitive domain that is less vulnerable to impairment as a result of LBW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Go and No-go responses were defined as during discrimination learning. Go responses in positive trials were rewarded, Go responses in negative trials were not rewarded and Go responses in ambiguous trials were rewarded to reduce potential effects of surprising non-reward [40][41][42] . According to the principles of the judgement bias task 29 , Go responses in ambiguous trials were interpreted as ꞌoptimisticꞌ responses, whereas No-go responses were interpreted as 'pessimisticꞌ responses.…”
Section: Experimental Arena and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%