2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-020-03065-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judd–Ofelt analysis and physical properties of erbium modified cadmium lithium gadolinium silicate glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that spectral UV-absorption is increasingly absorbed. Therefore, La2O3 is accountable for the slight growth of BO [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Absorption coefficient of the glasses exemplifies Fig.…”
Section: Optical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It has been reported that spectral UV-absorption is increasingly absorbed. Therefore, La2O3 is accountable for the slight growth of BO [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Absorption coefficient of the glasses exemplifies Fig.…”
Section: Optical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Spectral UV according to reports, increasing. As a result, MoO3 is to blame for the slight increase in BO [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Figure 4 shows the absorption coefficient of the glasses.…”
Section: Optical Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular weights and densities are commonly used to evaluate glass density [26][27][28][29][30]. BaO was increased in this study at the expense of LiF.…”
Section: Physical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%