Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s19-2118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JU_ETCE_17_21 at SemEval-2019 Task 6: Efficient Machine Learning and Neural Network Approaches for Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Tweets

Abstract: This paper describes our system submissions as part of our participation (team name: JU ETCE 17 21) in the SemEval 2019 shared task 6: "OffensEval: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media". We participated in all the three sub-tasks: i) Sub-task A: offensive language identification, ii) Sub-task B: automatic categorization of offense types, and iii) Sub-task C: offense target identification. We employed machine learning as well as deep learning approaches for the sub-tasks. We employed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this RNN architecture, uni-gram and bi-gram features were used and in a fully connected (FC) layer, seven different machine learning models were performed. Pal et al applied different machine learning and deep learning algorithms [37]. While the best among machine learning algorithms was LR-tri-gram with 0.7231 F-score, among deep learning algorithms the best was CNN-Glove with 0.7844 F-score.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this RNN architecture, uni-gram and bi-gram features were used and in a fully connected (FC) layer, seven different machine learning models were performed. Pal et al applied different machine learning and deep learning algorithms [37]. While the best among machine learning algorithms was LR-tri-gram with 0.7231 F-score, among deep learning algorithms the best was CNN-Glove with 0.7844 F-score.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%