Applications of Digital Image Processing XL 2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2273625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JPEG XS, a new standard for visually lossless low-latency lightweight image compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VR applications require low-latency and low-complexity coding that can reduce the bandwidth of frames sent from a GPU to a display. Such requirements are addressed in the recent JPEG XS standard (ISO/IEC 21122) [9]. In Section 7.1 we demonstrate how the efficiency of JPEG XS can be further improved when combined with the proposed method.…”
Section: Coding and Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VR applications require low-latency and low-complexity coding that can reduce the bandwidth of frames sent from a GPU to a display. Such requirements are addressed in the recent JPEG XS standard (ISO/IEC 21122) [9]. In Section 7.1 we demonstrate how the efficiency of JPEG XS can be further improved when combined with the proposed method.…”
Section: Coding and Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate the potential for additional bandwidth savings, we tested our method in conjunction with one of the latest compression protocols designed for real-time applications -the JPEG XS standard (ISO/IEC 21122). The JPEG XS standard defines a low-complexity and low-latency compression algorithm for applications where (due to the latency requirements) it was common to use uncompressed image data [9]. As JPEG XS offers various degrees of parallelism, it can be efficiently implemented on a multitude of CPUs, GPUs and FPGAs.…”
Section: Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So maintaining a high data rate across the interfaces requires more power, more wires, and more shielding to prevent electromagnetic interference 1 . These requirements increase device weight, hardware cost, and complexity and are sometimes economically infeasible with current technology 2 . Bandwidth can be greatly reduced using existing algorithms such as H.264 Intra‐only, Motion JPEG 2000, 3 and Dirac/VC‐2, 4 but these algorithms cannot provide visually lossless quality with modest hardware complexity, in real time, and with the low latency expected of a display link 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The current status of the JPEG XS technical development is outlined in. 12 This paper summarizes the subjective evaluations performed on proponent submissions in response to the JPEG XS CfP. Section 2.1 discusses the test methodology and outlines how the visually (near) lossless content was subjectively assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%