Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Invading the Private 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429428586-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Journalistic material in the UK criminal process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But for the injunction preventing publication of the source's information, the result in Goodwin might have been very different, a position many may find unsatisfactory. 225 Although Lord Woolf CJ's and May LJ's unreserved acceptance of the core positions in Goodwin and genuine efforts to address the merits from that perspective are encouraging, the judgments in Ashworth and Ackroyd (1) still retain some of the weaknesses of the standard common law approach. 226 Like the majority in British Steel, 227 the Lords in Ashworth too readily accepted AHA's limited evidence as to access to the information, the unfortunate speculation that the source must have been an employee and the character of that employee as a paid and disloyal person, not an unpaid public spirited informant.…”
Section: The Chilling Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But for the injunction preventing publication of the source's information, the result in Goodwin might have been very different, a position many may find unsatisfactory. 225 Although Lord Woolf CJ's and May LJ's unreserved acceptance of the core positions in Goodwin and genuine efforts to address the merits from that perspective are encouraging, the judgments in Ashworth and Ackroyd (1) still retain some of the weaknesses of the standard common law approach. 226 Like the majority in British Steel, 227 the Lords in Ashworth too readily accepted AHA's limited evidence as to access to the information, the unfortunate speculation that the source must have been an employee and the character of that employee as a paid and disloyal person, not an unpaid public spirited informant.…”
Section: The Chilling Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%