Journalismus als Beruf

Requate, Jörg

doi:10.13109/9783666357725

Cited by 132 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…International comparative studies are needed to make national paths of digitalization of media systems (Mattoni and Ceccobelli, 2018) and the journalistic adaptation of the Internet (e.g., Singer et al, 2011) obvious. Historical studies show not only variations but also general trends in the professionalization of journalism in Europe (Kunelius et al, 2020;Requate, 1995). This evidence raises the question how digital journalistic practices' transnationally diffuse (Broersma, 2020;Kunert et al, 2022) through mutual observation and imitation (Oggolder et al, 2020: 341).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How journalism adapted the Internet in Germany: Results of six newsroom surveys (1997–2014)

Neuberger

2024

Journalism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on six newsroom surveys, this article analyzes the history of digital German journalism. The surveys cover a period of 17 years (1997–2014). Periodizing the history of digital journalism into three phases, this article considers the interplay between journalism and journalism research. The results show how journalistic digital media define their role in the relationships between old media and the Internet, digital media and other outlets, and digital media and their audiences. Furthermore, the results substantiate how digital editorial staff define their journalistic identities regarding tasks, rules, and skills. During the first period (surveys conducted in 1997 and 2000), the view from old mass media to the Internet dominated, also in scholarship where the mass media paradigm was extended to the Internet. The second period (surveys conducted in 2006 and 2007) was characterized by clarifying the relationships between journalism and newly emerged outlets. These studies focused on how participative formats (such as Wikipedia and blogs) and search engines could be used for journalistic purposes without compromising quality. These new outlets were not regarded then as much of a threat. This attitude did not change during the third period (surveys conducted in 2010 and 2014). In this phase, too, the studies focused on how editorial staff utilized the ever-increasing number of social media. The six surveys’ different research interests reveal that the reviewed journalism research primarily addressed changing demands in journalistic practice. Therefore, exogenous factors (“the sector”) had a greater impact than endogenous factors (the “scholarship”) on research interests.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How journalism adapted the Internet in Germany: Results of six newsroom surveys (1997–2014)

Neuberger

2024

Journalism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…15 See Kött (2004), 216f. ; see also Requate (1995), Part A. On the connection between reportage and social research since the end of the nineteenth century, see Lindner (1990), who explains the emergence of urban sociology in the work of Robert Ezra Park in Chicago with reference to the format of reportage and the profession of journalism.…”

Section: Respectful Interrogationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interview and interior: Procedures of narrative surveys around 1900

Heesen¹

2021

Sci Context

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Argument In the spring of 1893, the Austrian writer and critic Hermann Bahr began interviewing various people on antisemitism, a subject of heated discussion in the European feuilleton around 1900. “Once again, I am travelling the world sounding out people’s opinions and listening to what they have to say,” he wrote in his introduction to a series of articles on that issue that appeared in the feuilleton of the Deutsche Zeitung between March and September 1893. A year later, the Berlin publishing house S. Fischer turned Bahr’s articles into a book. Bahr conducted a total of thirty-eight interviews with prominent personages, such as August Bebel, Theodor Mommsen, Ernst Haeckel, Henrik Ibsen and Jules Simon. Bahr did not focus on the arguments in favour or against antisemitism. Instead, he set out explicitly to investigate the sentiments, perceptions and opinions on this topic within the cultured classes. Yet, as I will show in this article, Bahr tried to capture not only the “sentiments” [Empfindungen] aired by his interviewees, but also the settings and interiors in which the interviews took place. I argue that these descriptions of physical space served Bahr as authentication, as a three-dimensional certificate for the “facts of opinion” [Meinungstatsachen] he recorded.

show abstract