2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1843-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Journal gatekeepers indicator-based top universities of the world, of Europe and of 29 countries — A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This point was stressed by some empirical papers which ranked academic institutions on the basis of their representation on the editorial boards of top journals (Braun et al 2007;Gibbons and Fish 1991;Kaufman 1984); Braun and Diospatonyi (2005) proposed to rank nations according to the strength of their research systems using quantitative indicators of the presence of national editor in international journals. Interestingly, Gibbons and Fish (1991) found that there is a correlation between the ranking of institutions based on the membership of their affiliated scholars on editorial boards and those based on citations and publications in top journals.…”
Section: Editorial Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point was stressed by some empirical papers which ranked academic institutions on the basis of their representation on the editorial boards of top journals (Braun et al 2007;Gibbons and Fish 1991;Kaufman 1984); Braun and Diospatonyi (2005) proposed to rank nations according to the strength of their research systems using quantitative indicators of the presence of national editor in international journals. Interestingly, Gibbons and Fish (1991) found that there is a correlation between the ranking of institutions based on the membership of their affiliated scholars on editorial boards and those based on citations and publications in top journals.…”
Section: Editorial Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual institutions and researchers are now classified on the basis of scientific productivity, usually established using the number of papers, the impact factors for the journals and the number of citations (see, e.g., Bishop, Gillet, Holliday, & Willet, 2003;Braun, 1999;Hirsch, 2005;Schreiber, 2008;Winkler, 2007). However, as pointed out by some authors (Braun, Dióspatonyi, Zádor, & Zsindely, 2007), attempts at ranking institutions and scientists have sometimes produced disparate and inappropriate results. In fact, the difficulty is to clearly understand what good science is and to know if data reflects quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In academia, the editorial boards of scholarly journals have an important influence on the quality and relevance of published research (Garcia-Carpintero et al 2010); 'it is considered that the critical mentality and decisions of editorial boards protect the social and intellectual integrity of science' (Braun andDiospatonyi 2005a: 1548). Editorial boards are important to the entire academic world, and there seems to be a possible relationship between a university's representation on a journal's editorial board and its scientific output in that journal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%