The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4790709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joule heat generation in thermionic cathodes of high-pressure arc discharges

Abstract: The nonlinear surface heating model of plasma-cathode interaction in high-pressure arcs is extended to take into account the Joule effect inside the cathode body. Calculation results are given for different modes of current transfer to tungsten cathodes of different configurations in argon plasmas of atmospheric or higher pressures. Special attention is paid to analysis of energy balances of the cathode and the near-cathode plasma layer. In all the cases, the variation of potential inside the cathode is much s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distributions of the energy ‡ux to the cathode surface (…gure 8(b)) are in a good agreement for I = 60 A, but deviate for 100 A and especially for 200 A. Note that one could think that this deviation is a consequence of Joule e¤ect inside the cathode, which was taken into account in the NLTE-sheath approach but not in the realization of the model of nonlinear surface heating being employed, however this has been disproved by additional simulations performed by means of the model of nonlinear heating with account of the Joule e¤ect as in [46].…”
Section: Other Possible Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributions of the energy ‡ux to the cathode surface (…gure 8(b)) are in a good agreement for I = 60 A, but deviate for 100 A and especially for 200 A. Note that one could think that this deviation is a consequence of Joule e¤ect inside the cathode, which was taken into account in the NLTE-sheath approach but not in the realization of the model of nonlinear surface heating being employed, however this has been disproved by additional simulations performed by means of the model of nonlinear heating with account of the Joule e¤ect as in [46].…”
Section: Other Possible Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors modeled cylindrical tungsten cathodes in argon plasma for various configurations, and current ranging from 1 to 500 A. From their results, it can be seen that the current threshold I depends on several parameters such as the electrode radius R (varied from 0.3 to 1.0 mm in [32]) and the tip geometry (hemispherical, or flat in [32]). For the set of configurations studied in [32] the current threshold I was observed to vary from 26 A (when R = 0.3 mm) to 274 A (when R = 1.0 mm).…”
Section: Cathode-modelling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From their results, it can be seen that the current threshold I depends on several parameters such as the electrode radius R (varied from 0.3 to 1.0 mm in [32]) and the tip geometry (hemispherical, or flat in [32]). For the set of configurations studied in [32] the current threshold I was observed to vary from 26 A (when R = 0.3 mm) to 274 A (when R = 1.0 mm). It should be noticed that parameters other than R (such as the argon pressure and the inter-electrode distance) were simultaneously varied in [32], and to our knowledge the exact dependence of I is not established yet.…”
Section: Cathode-modelling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations