Joshua as a Warrior in Hebrew Ben Sira 46:1-10

Corley, Jeremy

doi:10.1515/9783110222784.207

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Begg provides a wide-ranging interpretation of the reception of Joshua in the ancient period, focusing particularly on the interpretation of Rahab (2005a); the fall of Jericho (2005b); and the campaigns of Joshua (2007) in Josephus; as well as the rewriting of Joshua in Pseudo-Philo (2012). Corley devotes two studies to the interpretation of Joshua in Ben Sirach, the ﬁrst explores the function of Joshua as a warrior (2010) and the second compares the interpretation of Joshua and Samuel (2011). Earl (2010) provides an extensive examination of Origen’s interpretation of Joshua; Nissan (2011) interprets Joshua in Pseudo-Sirach; Schnocks (2012) targets the function of Joshua in the book of Maccabees; and Avemarie (2007) provides a broader study of Joshua throughout ancient Judaism.…”

Section: Reception Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Book of Joshua in Recent Research

Dozeman

2017

Currents in Biblical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on the book of Joshua is developing significantly in a variety of different areas. The review summarizes current scholarship in six distinct methodological approaches: (1) textual criticism; (2) composition and literary context; (3) history, archaeology and geography; (4) violence, genocide and conquest; (5) literary and ideological studies; and (6) reception history. The article will conclude with a brief summary of recent collected studies and commentaries on Joshua. The focus of interpretation will be the last ten years supplementing Greenspoon (2005).

show abstract

Section: Reception Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Book of Joshua in Recent Research

Dozeman

2017

Currents in Biblical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

L’histoire de Josué et de Kalev selon Ben Sira 46,1-10

Lavoie

2023

theologi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dans cette étude sur Ben Sira, l’auteur propose une double analyse comparée. D’une part, il compare le texte de 46,1-10 aux autres textes qui évoquent Josué et Kalev, ces deux grandes figures de la conquête, afin de cerner la manière dont Ben Sira et son petit-fils ont choisi de se les approprier. D’autre part, comme le texte de 46,1-10 a été conservé en hébreu (texte de Ben Sira) et en grec (texte du petit-fils), l’auteur traduit les deux versions de façon à bien mettre en évidence leurs divergences significatives et à mieux cerner leur originalité. Cette double analyse comparée permet de constater que Ben Sira et son petit-fils ont fait un intense travail non seulement de sélection mais aussi d’interprétation.

show abstract

Joshua as a Warrior in Hebrew Ben Sira 46:1-10

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

The Book of Joshua in Recent Research

The Book of Joshua in Recent Research

L’histoire de Josué et de Kalev selon Ben Sira 46,1-10

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About