2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4935255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Josephson systems based on ballistic point contacts between single-band and multi-band superconductors

Abstract: The Josephson effect in ballistic point contacts between single-band and multi-band superconductors was investigated. It was found that in the case of Josephson junctions formed by a single-band and an s ± -wave two-band superconductor as well as by a single-band and a three-band superconductor the junctions become frustrated, demonstrating the φ-contact properties. Depending on the ground state of a three-band superconductor with broken time-reversal symmetry (BTRS), the Josephson junction can have from one t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a dc SQUID formed by the Josephson microcontacts between a single-band and multi-band (two-or three-band) superconductors with ballistic conductivity, the specific features of the system are preserved, differing only quantitatively. 114…”
Section: Quantum Interferometers Based On Multiband Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a dc SQUID formed by the Josephson microcontacts between a single-band and multi-band (two-or three-band) superconductors with ballistic conductivity, the specific features of the system are preserved, differing only quantitatively. 114…”
Section: Quantum Interferometers Based On Multiband Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schematic representation of an ScS microcontact between a singleband and multi-band (three-band) superconductor with time-reversal symmetry breaking. The arrows correspond to the phases of the order parameters in each of the superconducting banks 114.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their emergence is the result of the contribution of the interband impurities, whose strength is characterized by the interband scattering rate Γ, being proportional to the impurity concentration. In the literature the term with the coefficient a 12 is sometimes referred to as the Josephson-like interaction [12]. Analogously, the term with the coefficient k 12 can be called the Andreev-Bashkin-like drag, since the structure of this term is similar to the current-current coupling in the Andreev-Bashkin effect [35].…”
Section: Model and Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of non-zero phase shifts raises a reasonable question, namely how are these topics they manifested or could become visible in the observables? At this stage, it has already been theoretically established that the occurrence of such phase difference topics should affect the Josephson effect with the appearance of ϕ (ϕ 0 ) and π junctions and the corresponding current-phase relations [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], phase-sensitive structures like dc-SQUID with the unusual Fraunhofer diffraction patterns [17], the Little-Parks effect with the nonparabolic dependence of the critical temperature shift [18] and current states with anomalous characteristics of depairing curves [19]. Moreover, under certain circumstances an applied magnetic flux can drive the phase shift, converting a state with chiral s ± + is ++ symmetry into a s ± configuration, when the intercomponent phase difference is stable and equal to π, and vice versa [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of non-zero phase shifts raises a reasonable question, namely how are these topics they manifested or could they become visible in the observables? At this stage, it has already been theoretically established that the occurrence of such phase difference topics should affect the Josephson effect with the appearance of φ (φ 0 ) and π junctions and the corresponding current-phase relations [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], phase-sensitive structures like dc-SQUID with the unusual Fraunhofer diffraction patterns [18], the Little-Parks effect with the non-parabolic dependence of the critical temperature shift [19,20] and current states with anomalous characteristics of depairing curves [21]. Moreover, under certain circumstances an applied magnetic flux can drive the phase shift, converting a state with chiral s ± + is ++ symmetry into a s ± configuration, when the intercomponent phase difference is stable and equal to π, and vice versa [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%