2015
DOI: 10.1134/s0021364015110041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Josephson effect in SIFS tunnel junctions with domain walls in the weak link region

Abstract: We study theoretically the properties of SIFS type Josephson junctions composed of two superconducting (S) electrodes separated by an insulating layer (I) and a ferromagnetic (F) film consisting of periodic magnetic domains structure with antiparallel magnetization directions in neighboring domains. The two-dimensional problem in the weak link area is solved analytically in the framework of the linearized quasiclassical Usadel equations. Based on this solution, the spatial distributions of the critical current… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the limit of large d i values, the situation is actually determined by the properties of the first F layer, so that A → 0, ξ 1 and ξ 2 tend to the respective values for the first ferromagnetic film, and Eq. ( 34) transfers to the known formula simulating the penetration of superconductivity in the SF sandwich [36][37][38]. However, Eq.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the limit of large d i values, the situation is actually determined by the properties of the first F layer, so that A → 0, ξ 1 and ξ 2 tend to the respective values for the first ferromagnetic film, and Eq. ( 34) transfers to the known formula simulating the penetration of superconductivity in the SF sandwich [36][37][38]. However, Eq.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The phase φ is obtained from Eq. ( 37) as (38) Then, since the second term in Ψ(x) (34) vanishes at the points x mid = , the parameter A is given by the expression (39) Finally, the last constant in Ψ(x) (34) can be determined by the formula (40)…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest model of a diffusive S/F/S Josephson junction based on the Usadel equation 46 predicts that ξ F 1 = ξ F 2 = D F /E ex where D F and E ex are the diffusion constant and exchange energy of F, respectively, and has an overall phase offset φ ≡ (d 0−π /ξ F 2 ) − π/2 = π/4. In the presence of spinorbit or spin-flip scattering 50 , or when the F-layer contains domain walls 51 , one expects to find ξ F 1 < ξ F 2 . For strong ferromagnetic materials with large exchange energy, however, one often finds that ξ F 1 > ξ F 2 8 , a result that can be explained from a semi-ballistic calculation starting from the Eilenberger equation 44,45 .…”
Section: Measurement and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the dirty limit does not apply, the oscillation period of J d c F ( )may depend on many other parameters and does not have to be constant, but can change with the F layer thickness [57]. A multi-domain structured ferromagnet may also change J d c F ( ); for instance, the oscillation period decreases when the domain width increases [58].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%