2003
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.72.2299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Josephson Effect in d-Wave Superconductor Junctions in a Lattice Model

Abstract: Josephson current between two d-wave superconductors is calculated by using a lattice model. Here we consider two types of junctions, i.e., the parallel junction and the mirror-type junction. The maximum Josephson current (J c ) shows a wide variety of temperature (T ) dependence depending on the misorientation angles and the types of junctions. When the misorientation angles are not zero, the Josephson current shows the low-temperature anomaly because of a zero energy state (ZES) at the interfaces. In the cas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
9
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 The ZES is also responsible for the low-temperature anomaly of the Josephson current between the two unconventional superconductors. 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 An electron incident into a normal-metal / superconductor (NS) interface suffers the Andreev reflection 22 by the pair potential in the superconductor. As a result, a hole traces back the original propagation path of the incident electron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 The ZES is also responsible for the low-temperature anomaly of the Josephson current between the two unconventional superconductors. 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 An electron incident into a normal-metal / superconductor (NS) interface suffers the Andreev reflection 22 by the pair potential in the superconductor. As a result, a hole traces back the original propagation path of the incident electron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 For a square lattice with d x 2 −y 2 -wave superconductor junctions treated within the TB-BdG formalism, ZESs were reported for several interfaces including the {110} interface. 32 However, it was also found that when using a lattice model the appearance of a ZES is sensitive to Friedel oscillations in the wave function. These can cause destructive interference between different surface lattice sites, leading to the disappearance of the ZES.…”
Section: E Ldos and The Existence Of Zesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21,22,23,24 So far a considerable number of studies have been made on the ZES itself and related phenomena of transport properties in both spin-singlet and spin-triplet unconventional superconductor junctions. 7,8,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50 The conductance in normal-metal / superconductor (NS) junctions is calculated from the normal and the Andreev reflection 51 coefficients which are obtained by solving the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) equation 52 under appropriate boundary conditions at the junction interface. Consequently we easily find the zero-bias conductance peak (ZBCP) in NS junctions of high-T c superconductors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%