2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Josephson current in ferromagnetic d-wave superconductor/ferromagnetic d-wave superconductor junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, the contribution of magnetic hysteresis loss is negligible due to the weak microwave field [5]. Meanwhile, the domain-wall resonance can be excluded in gigahertz range [10]. In this paper, thickness of the nanobelts is thinner than their skin depth.…”
Section: Theoretical Predictionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, the contribution of magnetic hysteresis loss is negligible due to the weak microwave field [5]. Meanwhile, the domain-wall resonance can be excluded in gigahertz range [10]. In this paper, thickness of the nanobelts is thinner than their skin depth.…”
Section: Theoretical Predictionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A simplified diagram in Fig. 3a shows the manners acting between microwave magnetic field (h) and non-geometrical effective in-plane anisotropy field (H e ) in a single Ni nanobelt.The magnetic susceptibility tensor can be expressed as [10] = where…”
Section: Theoretical Calculation Of the Intrinsic Permeability For Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] In Refs. [26]- [29], the Josephson currents for ferromagnetic superconductors with different pair symmetries have been studied. In all of them, the Josephson current versus the temperature and exchange field was studied, while in this paper, we study the Josephson current versus the potential strength of the junction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%