2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.89.165415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Josephson coupling through one-dimensional ballistic channel in semiconductor-superconductor hybrid quantum point contacts

Abstract: We study a superconducting quantum point contact made of a narrow In0.75Ga0.25As channel with Nb proximity electrodes. The narrow channel is formed in a gate-fitted constriction of InGaAs/InAlAs/InP heterostructure hosting a two-dimensional electron gas. When the channel opening is varied with the gate, the Josephson critical current exhibits a discretized variation that arises from the quantization of the transverse momentum in the channel. The quantization of Josephson critical current persists down to the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning the difference between the SN junctions studied here and SNS Josephson junctions studied previously [33][34][35][36], in which multiple ARs can take place. In Ref.…”
Section: Conductance Enhancement Via Ar In the Open-channel Regimementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is worth mentioning the difference between the SN junctions studied here and SNS Josephson junctions studied previously [33][34][35][36], in which multiple ARs can take place. In Ref.…”
Section: Conductance Enhancement Via Ar In the Open-channel Regimementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In nanowires, the soft-gap problem was recently resolved by growing Al epitaxially on InAs nanowires, yielding greatly reduced subgap conductance 6 7 . Studies of Sm–S systems based on top-down processed gateable two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs) coupled to superconductors have not explicitly addressed the soft-gap issue yet 8 9 . However experiments on such systems have demonstrated other theoretical predictions, such as quantization of critical current 9 10 11 , the retro-reflection property of Andreev scattering 12 , and spectroscopy of a gate-defined quantum dot with superconducting leads 13 14 , which do not require a hard proximity-induced gap in the semiconductor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these peaks at B= 0 T and T= 300 mK, we estimate the induced gap ind =0.65 meV using the relation = eVSD. The ind obtained here is about half of the value of high quality bulk Nb [10]. The separation of the peaks of induced superconducting gap, suppresses by increasing the magnetic field B, the position of the peaks shifts toward zero bias with further increasing the applied magnetic field B and the peaks disappear near B≈ 50 mT.…”
Section: Effect Of Magnetic Field On Induced Superconductivitymentioning
confidence: 53%