2013
DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2013.792378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joseph Schumpeter and Thorstein Veblen on technological determinism, individualism and institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, for scholars and academics, conspicuous diffusion offers a more tangible and unified conceptualization of conspicuous consumption, which the literature argues is a major shortcoming of Veblen's original theory (Patsiaouras and Fitchett 2012;Campbell 1995). Our study also points the way towards future research -it could for instance connect conspicuous diffusion to larger societal implications of Veblen's research, such as the role of institutions and technological determinism (Veblen and Banta 2009;Papageorgiou and Michaelides 2016;Brette 2003). Conspicuous diffusion may also improve the understanding of how status and socioeconomics actively guide and determine the diffusion process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, for scholars and academics, conspicuous diffusion offers a more tangible and unified conceptualization of conspicuous consumption, which the literature argues is a major shortcoming of Veblen's original theory (Patsiaouras and Fitchett 2012;Campbell 1995). Our study also points the way towards future research -it could for instance connect conspicuous diffusion to larger societal implications of Veblen's research, such as the role of institutions and technological determinism (Veblen and Banta 2009;Papageorgiou and Michaelides 2016;Brette 2003). Conspicuous diffusion may also improve the understanding of how status and socioeconomics actively guide and determine the diffusion process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Writing from an entirely different perspective than that of conspicuous consumption, Veblen subsequently focused on how technology influences society (Papageorgiou and Michaelides 2016;Brette 2003). Veblen sought to trace the evolutionary development of society over time, and suggested that technology could be the primary catalyst of societal and institutional change, contributing to a mode of thought known as "technological determinism" (Papageorgiou and Michaelides 2016). Irrespective of today's criticism against technological determinism, Veblen's original conceptualization of technological determinism was quite flexible and incorporated cultural aspects and the selfreinforcing nature of institutions (Brette 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides this reductionism, these theorists worked largely with data about Western Europe and the United States, which may not hold for the world economy as a whole (Wallerstein 1984). Another problem is that the post-Kondratieff tradition seeks to specify 'techno-industrial' or 'technoscientific' revolutions (say a 4IR) by an unfortunate teleology that projects 'long waves' into the future on a recapitulationist evolutionary logic (although Kondratieff himself was sceptical of such teleology [Mustafin 2018], and there is a suggestion that Schumpeter may have been too [Papageorgiou and Michaelides 2016]).…”
Section: Criteria For An Industrial Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is called the technological determinism analysis, and the other can be named as the social constructivism analysis. Specifically, the term “technological determinism” was coined to describe the proposition that technology in any given society defines its nature (Papageorgiou & Michaelides, 2016). Technological determinists argue that the Internet plays a decisive role in social changes (Dafoe, 2015; Rambe & Nel, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%