2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-004-0279-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jordan Ideals Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We claim that if (i) holds, then we may assume without loss of generality that θ is bijective. Indeed, J = ker θ is a closed Jordan ideal of A and as such it is an ideal [9,Theorem 5.3] (see also [7] for an alternative proof). Thus A/J is a C * -algebra, and θ induces a Jordan isomorphismθ from A/J onto B.…”
Section: Jordan Homomorphisms On C * -Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We claim that if (i) holds, then we may assume without loss of generality that θ is bijective. Indeed, J = ker θ is a closed Jordan ideal of A and as such it is an ideal [9,Theorem 5.3] (see also [7] for an alternative proof). Thus A/J is a C * -algebra, and θ induces a Jordan isomorphismθ from A/J onto B.…”
Section: Jordan Homomorphisms On C * -Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The converse problem, which has been studied for more than 50 years, is to describe Jordan ideals in terms of associative ideals, and to find conditions under which a non-zero Jordan ideal is in fact an associative ideal, or at least it contains a non-zero ideal. For a few references, see [2,3,27,12,13,28,29,7] and the literature therein. Among other papers, Oliveira in [27] showed that a weakly closed Jordan ideal in a nest algebra, which satisfies certain conditions, is an associative ideal.…”
Section: Lu and Yu Ieotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the authors in [2] showed that if the algebra generated by commutators of A is equal to A then each Jordan ideal is an associative ideal. In this section, we shall present some examples which shows that the Lie ideals and the Jordan ideals may be trivial even if the algebra does not satisfy those conditions.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental papers by Herstein [4] and Jacobson-Rickart [5] initiated the study of conditions guaranteeing that an algebra is JIF. It was proved that the class of JIF-algebras includes all simple algebras [4], all full matrix algebras M n (B), where B is a unital algebra [5], all W * -algebras (this was established in [3] for properly infinite W * -algebras and in [1], as well as in Bunce's unpublished paper, for the general case), and many other important examples. Denote by Alg([A , A ]) (respectively, by Id([A , A ])) the subalgebra (respectively, the ideal) of A generated by all commutators [a, b] = ab − ba, a, b ∈ A .…”
Section: Introduction Letmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Denote by Alg([A , A ]) (respectively, by Id([A , A ])) the subalgebra (respectively, the ideal) of A generated by all commutators [a, b] = ab − ba, a, b ∈ A . It was shown in [1] that the class of JIF-algebras contains all algebras generated by commutators, i.e., satisfying the condition…”
Section: Introduction Letmentioning
confidence: 99%