1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01077574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jordan form of coxeter transformations and applications to representations of finite graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also prove the following theorem concerning joins of trees. [31] if the common root z of the polynomials cox T 1 (t), . .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also prove the following theorem concerning joins of trees. [31] if the common root z of the polynomials cox T 1 (t), . .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is, of course, also trivially true when C defines a Dynkin graph (for, c is of finite order). In the case that C defines a tree, sharper results on the eigenvalues of the corresponding Coxeter transformations were obtained by N. A' Campo [1] and V. F. Subbotin and R. B. Stekolscik [7]; however, they do not generalize to the general situation of nonsymmetrizable matrices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The properties of CT's are well-studied [1][2][3][4] for all connected Coxeter graphs with B Γ (x) > 0 (Dynkin graphs) and with B Γ (x) ≥ 0 (affine (completed) Dynkin graphs) except for the affine cycle A n (simple cycle). In [1] (P. 146) it is proved that all CT's for graphs without cycles, independently of the choice of bijection (1), are conjugate in the group W .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their spectral properties coincide. For the graph A n , it is not the case, which gives no possibility to transfer completely the results from [1][2][3][4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%