Jolie Laide

Galt, Rosalind

doi:10.1002/9781118275733.ch24

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Before discussing Schmid's adaptation, a series of introductory comments on the controversies raised by the play and the film are in order. According to Fassbinder scholarship, the director wrote the play during an international flight to the USA (see Calandra 1988;Elsaesser 1996;Galt 2011). The play was loosely based on Gerhard Zwerenz's novel Die Erde ist unbewohnbar wie der Mond (The Earth is uninhabitable like the Moon, 1973).…”

Section: The Controversy Caused By the Play And The Filmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Militant Ethics

Koutsourakis¹

2020

Cultural Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The publication of Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s play Der Müll, die Stadt und der Tod (Garbage, the City, and Death; 1976) constitutes one of the major scandals in German cultural history. The play was accused of being anti-Semitic, because one of its key characters, a real estate speculator, was merely called the Rich Jew. Furthermore, some (negative) dramatis personae in the play openly express anti-Semitic views. When asked to respond, Fassbinder retorted that philo-Semites (in the West Germany of the time) are in fact anti-Semites, because they refuse to see how the victims of oppression can at times assume the roles and positions assigned to them by pernicious social structures. Fassbinder’s vilification on the part of the right-wing press prevented the play’s staging; subsequently, in 1984 and 1985–86 two Frankfurt productions were banned due to the reaction on the part of the local Jewish community. A similar controversy sparked off by the film adaptation of the play Shadow of Angels by Daniel Schmid. During the film’s screening at the Cannes Film Festival the Israeli delegation walked out, while there was also rumor of censorship in France. Gilles Deleuze wrote an article for Le Monde titled “The Rich Jew” defending the film and the director. Deleuze’s article triggered a furious reaction from Shoah (1985) director, Claude Lanzmann, who responded in Le Monde and attacked the cultural snobbery and “endemic terrorism” of the left-wing cinephile community. Lanzmann saw the film as wholly anti-Semitic and suggested that it identifies the Jew—all Jews—with money. While the author acknowledges the complexity of the subject, he revisits the debate and the film to unpack its ethical/aesthetic intricacy and propose a pathway that can potentially enable us to think of ways that political incorrectness can function as a means of exposing the persistence of historical and ethical questions that are ostentatiously resolved. He does this by drawing on Alain Badiou’s idea of militant ethics and Jacques Rancière’s redefinition of critical art as one that produces dissensus.

show abstract

Section: The Controversy Caused By the Play And The Filmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Militant Ethics

Koutsourakis¹

2020

Cultural Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Jolie Laide

Cited by 1 publication

References 11 publications

Militant Ethics

Militant Ethics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About