2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joints and wood shear walls modelling II: Experimental tests and FE models under seismic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the corner of the sheathing panels, the nail head embedding (Figure 5b) and the relative displacement between panels (Figure 5c) were observed. As to the common failure modes, e.g., nail pull-through, nail withdrawal and the pull-out of the vertical studs, as reported in [12,[32][33][34][35], they were not observed in this test. The yielding in the PT frame was also not observed.…”
Section: Hysteretic Response and Failure Modesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In the corner of the sheathing panels, the nail head embedding (Figure 5b) and the relative displacement between panels (Figure 5c) were observed. As to the common failure modes, e.g., nail pull-through, nail withdrawal and the pull-out of the vertical studs, as reported in [12,[32][33][34][35], they were not observed in this test. The yielding in the PT frame was also not observed.…”
Section: Hysteretic Response and Failure Modesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The shear walls underwent only limited deformation (at the top of the walls) and adequately braced the structure. For instance, the maximum displacement was 45 mm for GUA 390%, whereas a modern timber-framed wall [OSB12 panels with 1.5 tons at the top of the wall (Humbert et al 2014 andBoudaud et al 2014)] reaches 44 mm for GUA 320% (and in similar experimental configurations: ground motion, shake table, etc.). The global hysteretic response has been analyzed through the base shear versus the top displacement of both the transverse wall and shear wall.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Humbert et al [38,39], presentaron un estudio en dos partes. En la primera, desarrollaron un modelo de elementos finitos calibrado mediante ensayos de laboratorio para determinar los parámetros del modelo histerético que se muestra en la figura 7, mismo que describe el comportamiento no lineal de las uniones S2F, representadas dentro del modelo de elementos finitos por medio de resortes de conexión entre dos nodos.…”
Section: Enfoques De Modeladounclassified