2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.103.064065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jointly fitting weak lensing, x-ray, and Sunyaev-Zel’dovich data to constrain scalar-tensor theories with clusters of galaxies

Abstract: Degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor (DHOST) theories are considered the most general class of scalartensor theories with an additional scalar field. DHOST theories modify the laws of gravity even at galaxy clusters scale hence affecting the weak lensing, x-ray, and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich observables. We derive the theoretical expression for the lensing convergence κ and the pressure profile P of clusters in the framework of DHOST theories and quantify how much they deviate from their general relativity counterpa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1), this model is fully characterized, at the scales and in the limit of interest, by four parameters, namely, {Ξ 1 , Ξ 2 , Ξ 3 , γ 0 }, which can be related to more general EFT parameters by Eqs. ( 9) [64]. This model represents a generalisation with respect to the one analysed in [55,56], including one more term in the metric potential equation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1), this model is fully characterized, at the scales and in the limit of interest, by four parameters, namely, {Ξ 1 , Ξ 2 , Ξ 3 , γ 0 }, which can be related to more general EFT parameters by Eqs. ( 9) [64]. This model represents a generalisation with respect to the one analysed in [55,56], including one more term in the metric potential equation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M (r) = 8πrρ(r) + 4πr 2 dρ dr , with ρ the mass density of the system; Ξ 1 , Ξ 2 and Ξ 3 (using the notation of [64]) are three dimensionless parameters which fully characterize the model and its deviation from GR, that can be recovered when Ξ 1,2,3 → 0; and G N is the measured effective gravitational constant, which might be different from the bare gravitational constant G defined from M 2 P L = (8πG) −1 . The fractional difference between G and G N is generally expressed as a parameter as [63]…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a tool will be of great interest for the astrophysical community, giving the opportunity to answer more complex questions [13], e.g. testing General Relativity [14] or assessing the heterogeneity of thermodynamic properties within the cluster population, such as the scatter in pressure or mass profiles.…”
Section: Current and Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with: G N , the measured effective gravitational constant (the bare constant G defined in terms of the Planck mass M P l = (8πG) −1 ); M (r), the spherical mass enclosed in the radius r and M (r) and M (r), respectively, the first and the second order derivatives of the mass with respect to r; Ξ 1,2,3 , the parameters that define the properties of the model [56]. From Eq.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%