2014
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2014.0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Variant and De Novo Mutation Identification on Pedigrees from High-Throughput Sequencing Data

Abstract: The analysis of whole-genome or exome sequencing data from trios and pedigrees has been successfully applied to the identification of disease-causing mutations. However, most methods used to identify and genotype genetic variants from next-generation sequencing data ignore the relationships between samples, resulting in significant Mendelian errors, false positives and negatives. Here we present a Bayesian network framework that jointly analyzes data from all members of a pedigree simultaneously using Mendelia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the possible allelic combinations of the mother and child at each site (Table S8) 4 combinations are informative if only the mother is phased while 8 are informative if both the mother and child are phased. We first obtained a gold standard phased set of calls for the NA12878 duo by using the CEPH 13 member pedigree and only considered sites for which the phase and genotype information are consistent across all members of the pedigree, who had been previously sequenced (59). This approach yielded a set of 53 crossovers with a mean interval length of 40.5kb.…”
Section: Sm S155 Obtaining Recombination Breakpoints Using Phased Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the possible allelic combinations of the mother and child at each site (Table S8) 4 combinations are informative if only the mother is phased while 8 are informative if both the mother and child are phased. We first obtained a gold standard phased set of calls for the NA12878 duo by using the CEPH 13 member pedigree and only considered sites for which the phase and genotype information are consistent across all members of the pedigree, who had been previously sequenced (59). This approach yielded a set of 53 crossovers with a mean interval length of 40.5kb.…”
Section: Sm S155 Obtaining Recombination Breakpoints Using Phased Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reads were aligned to the reference human genome (GRCh37) and pedigree-informed variant calling was performed with the Real Time Genomics (RTG) integrated analysis tool rtgFamily v.3.2. 22 All variants were annotated with SnpEff v.3.4 23 and filtered to include SNPs and indels predicted to result in altered mRNA splicing or protein sequence. Rare variants were identified on the basis of a MAF < 0.01 in both the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) Exome Variant Server and 1000 Genomes database (October 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However with current approaches the likelihood of detecting insertions and deletions of DNA (indels) is inversely proportional to the size of the indel (25). A number of integrated open source software tools exist as alternatives to GATK including FreeBayes and the RTG suite, each which may offer advantages over GATK in areas such as detection of indels, calling variants within familial pedigrees, and processing time (26,27). …”
Section: Current Methods In Genome Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%