2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2663-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint use of remote sensing data and volunteered geographic information for exposure estimation: evidence from Valparaíso, Chile

Abstract: The impact of natural hazards on mankind has increased dramatically over the past decades. Global urbanization processes and increasing spatial concentrations of exposed elements induce natural hazard risk at a uniquely high level. To mitigate affiliated perils requires detailed knowledge about elements at risk. Considering a high spatio-temporal variability of elements at risk, detailed information is costly both in terms of time and economic resources and therefore often incomplete, aggregated, or outdated. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these data sources reflect the increasingly volumes of data that are routinely in open and free access to high-quality national mapping agency data, providing highly consistent ancillary data resources to support dasymetric interpolation (Langford, 2013). User-contributed information and VGI provide alternative sources of ancillary data for dasymetric interpolation, as used in a number of studies (Bakillah et al, 2014;Kunze & Hecht, 2015;Geiß et al, 2017). Although there are potential quality issues, these provide valuable data sources that can complement official and commercial data (Goodchild, 2007;Bakillah et al, 2014).…”
Section: New Forms Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these data sources reflect the increasingly volumes of data that are routinely in open and free access to high-quality national mapping agency data, providing highly consistent ancillary data resources to support dasymetric interpolation (Langford, 2013). User-contributed information and VGI provide alternative sources of ancillary data for dasymetric interpolation, as used in a number of studies (Bakillah et al, 2014;Kunze & Hecht, 2015;Geiß et al, 2017). Although there are potential quality issues, these provide valuable data sources that can complement official and commercial data (Goodchild, 2007;Bakillah et al, 2014).…”
Section: New Forms Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also possible to generate entirely new remote sensing data products using VGI. For example, collecting high quality and up-to-date authoritative training data for supervised remote sensing image classification can be expensive, time consuming, and difficult [114], so recently, some studies [114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121] have explored the feasibility of using VGI as an alternative source of training data. While the majority of the previous studies deployed the OpenStreetMap (https://www.openstreetmap.org) (OSM) crowdsourced dataset [114][115][116] as an alternative nonauthoritative source for teaching the different supervised image classification algorithms to produce land use/land cover (LULC) maps, a few studies explored other fully or partially crowdsourced data sources such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (https://www.gbif.org) (GBIF) dataset (e.g., see [119]) or Virtual Interpretation of Earth Web-Interface Tool (VIEW-IT) dataset (e.g., see [120]) for these means.…”
Section: Vgi As a Source For Providing The Training Data For Remote Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A deterministic framework to create land use and land cover maps from crowdsourced maps such as OSM data was proposed in [10]. Machine learning tools (a random forest variant) also allow coupling remote sensing and volunteered geographic information (VGI) to predict natural hazard exposure [11] and local climate zones [8], while active deep learning helps finding unlabeled objects in OSM [5]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no VGI has been used as an input (opposite of a target) in deep neural networks yet.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%