2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint time-delay and frequency estimation using parallel factor analysis

Abstract: : In this paper, the problem of joint time-delay and frequency estimation of multiple sinusoidal signals received at two separated sensors is addressed. By formulating the estimation problem with the use of the parallel factor analysis framework, the corresponding state transition and observation matrices are updated in an iterative manner according to alternating least squares, from which the time-delay and frequencies are then estimated. Computer simulations are included to demonstrate the effectiveness of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [16] uses adaptive phase tracking to track the signal phase changes and estimates the phase difference using the difference between the two estimated values of the phase tracker, but it is difficult to estimate dynamic phase difference. Reference [17] uses adaptive delay compensation for the input signal. The compensated signal is aligned with the reference signal, and the delay compensation factor is calculated and corrected under the least mean square error criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [16] uses adaptive phase tracking to track the signal phase changes and estimates the phase difference using the difference between the two estimated values of the phase tracker, but it is difficult to estimate dynamic phase difference. Reference [17] uses adaptive delay compensation for the input signal. The compensated signal is aligned with the reference signal, and the delay compensation factor is calculated and corrected under the least mean square error criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By exploring the spatial information of the sources, more robust pitch estimators have been proposed [10][11][12][13][14]. Most of those multi-channel methods are still mainly based on auto-correlation function-related approaches, however, although a few exceptions can be found in [15][16][17][18]. In direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimators, audio and speech signals are often modeled as broadband signal, and standard subspace methods such as MUSIC and ESPRIT are only defined for narrowband signal model, which then fail to directly operate on broadband signals [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7.3. An implementation of the algorithm proposed by [64] was tested on a mixture of three sinusoids at different frequencies with delays of 1.7 seconds between sensors (Fig. 7.1).…”
Section: Results For Parafacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a ir b jr c kr + ε ijk changes in the relative contribution from one factor to another in all three domains so that no two factors in any domain are collinear. The PARAFAC model has been extended in [64] to incorporate any delays that may occur due to widely spaced sensors. In the simulations, time delays of greater than 1 second are assumed to be a threshold for using this widely spaced sensor model.…”
Section: Parafacmentioning
confidence: 99%