2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Testlet Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Paired Local Item Dependence in Response Times and Response Accuracy

Abstract: In joint models for item response times (RTs) and response accuracy (RA), local item dependence is composed of local RA dependence and local RT dependence. The two components are usually caused by the same common stimulus and emerge as pairs. Thus, the violation of local item independence in the joint models is called paired local item dependence. To address the issue of paired local item dependence while applying the joint cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), this study proposed a joint testlet cognitive diagno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(89 reference statements)
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RMSE ranged from 0.391 to 0.618 across conditions, which was acceptable because the latent trait was measured by only five binary attributes. The results were similar to those found in the literature of the HO-DINA model (de la Torre and Douglas, 2004 ; Huang and Wang, 2014 ; Zhan et al, 2018a , b ). The longer the test length and the higher the item quality, the smaller the RMSE and the larger the Cor, indicating a better recovery.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RMSE ranged from 0.391 to 0.618 across conditions, which was acceptable because the latent trait was measured by only five binary attributes. The results were similar to those found in the literature of the HO-DINA model (de la Torre and Douglas, 2004 ; Huang and Wang, 2014 ; Zhan et al, 2018a , b ). The longer the test length and the higher the item quality, the smaller the RMSE and the larger the Cor, indicating a better recovery.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The longer the test length and the higher the item quality, the smaller the RMSE and the larger the Cor, indicating a better recovery. In addition, in previous studies about the HO-DINA model (e.g., de la Torre and Douglas, 2004 ; Zhan et al, 2018a , b ), the correlation coefficient of the true and estimated higher-order ability is approximately ranged from 0.6 to 0.8; However, in the HO-PINC model, the correlation coefficient is generally higher than 0.95, indicating that the higher-order ability can be better recovered in the HO-PINC model than in the HO-DINA model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This approach is yet limited because in many applications indicators do not necessarily represent an interrelated dimension(s) of a generic construct and thus models can suffer from estimation challenges. Other applications of modeling conditional dependence can be found in Qu et al (1996), Wang and Wilson (2005), Im (2017), Hansen et al (2016), and Zhan et al (2018).…”
Section: Current Methods For Handling Conditional Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, testlets can be used in cognitive diagnosis assessment. Although it is not conceptually challenging to add a set of random effect parameters into CDMs, limited efforts have been made to the development of testlet CDMs (e.g., Hansen et al, 2016;Liao & Jiao, 2016;Zhan, Li, Wang, Bian, & Wang, 2015;Zhan, Liao, & Bian, 2018).…”
Section: A Dina Model For Testlet Designmentioning
confidence: 99%