2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2015.7225789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint spatial- and Doppler-based ego-motion estimation for automotive radars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensor velocity, v s = (v x , v y ), mounting position, (l, b), and viewing direction, θ s , are used as dummy variables without ground truths; they are used for regularization to assist training and reduce over-fitting. As previously examined [9]- [11], [13], [40], the observed static target has a velocity that is directly opposite to the sensor velocity, v s . From the perspective of radars measuring the instantaneous radial velocity, v r,i , of targets, the sensor velocity can be estimated using the bearing angle, θ i , and the radial velocity relationships of two or more static targets, as follows:…”
Section: Geometric Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensor velocity, v s = (v x , v y ), mounting position, (l, b), and viewing direction, θ s , are used as dummy variables without ground truths; they are used for regularization to assist training and reduce over-fitting. As previously examined [9]- [11], [13], [40], the observed static target has a velocity that is directly opposite to the sensor velocity, v s . From the perspective of radars measuring the instantaneous radial velocity, v r,i , of targets, the sensor velocity can be estimated using the bearing angle, θ i , and the radial velocity relationships of two or more static targets, as follows:…”
Section: Geometric Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This work, which determined an ego-velocity vector of 2 degrees of freedom (DoF), was extended to the case of multiple distributed radars that deals with the full 2D vehicle motion state, i.e., 3 DoF [10]. A probabilistic approach incorporating spatial registrations of radar scans was also proposed [11]. This joint spatial and Doppler-based estimation functions without lever-arm offsets or motion assumptions but involves significant computational costs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our motivation behind the second simulated evaluation stems from ego-motion estimation using sensors that measure sets of spatial points, such as radars or lidars. This task can be interpreted as a robust point set registration problem, as shown for example by [17] with radar sensors. We apply the concept from [18] to represent two set of points with Gaussian mixture models and register them in a distributionto-distribution manner.…”
Section: B Point Set Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used between consecutive scans this can provide a very accurate replacement to wheel-based or inertial sensor odometry. In [14] Barjenbruch et. al showed impressive results when estimating velocity and yaw-rate using a similar radar sensor to the ones used in this work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When localizing we want to remove measurements from moving targets from both X and Y . By thresholding the difference between the measured Doppler velocityṙ i with the expected Doppler velocity for stationary targets, V i , [14] we can remove most moving targets from consideration. V i is the Doppler velocity that would be measured from a stationary target based on the motion of the sensor, where the sensor pose relative to the vehicle pose, s t , is (x s , y s , α s )…”
Section: B Sensor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%