2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/eusipco.2017.8081645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint sensor placement and power rating selection in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After quantization, the observation is encoded to be sent over N b channels with an average powerP l,k,b . Denoting the encoded signal as,x l,k,b = [x (1) l,k,bx…”
Section: B Digital Transmission Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After quantization, the observation is encoded to be sent over N b channels with an average powerP l,k,b . Denoting the encoded signal as,x l,k,b = [x (1) l,k,bx…”
Section: B Digital Transmission Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• We model a practical system which takes the EH, channel gain and measurement accuracy into account. Similar considerations were taken into account in [1,2,22,16], however, all of them assumed analog communication where sensors directly amplify and forward observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in our optimization problem we want to select one sensor from a specific set, select another one from another set, etc., for a given number of such sets. This second obstacle is also considered in [33], but we are not aware of any similar studies. In [33], each sensor position is associated with a small pool of candidate sensors, corresponding to different sensor types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This second obstacle is also considered in [33], but we are not aware of any similar studies. In [33], each sensor position is associated with a small pool of candidate sensors, corresponding to different sensor types. However, since the inverse covariance matrix in [33] is still a linear function of the selection variables, we cannot employ similar techniques to solve our problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation