Abstract:The user scheduling and precoding schemes in Multi-User Multiple Input Multiple Output (MU-MIMO) system have the problem of high complexity and the performance of traditional criteria is not good. This paper analysis the advantages of Signal to Leakage plus Noise Ratio (SLNR) criteria firstly, then propose a cross-layer design of user scheduling and precoding scheme based on SLNR criteria. The design only uses SLNR criteria and includes an improved SLNR user scheduling scheme which is accomplished by iteration… Show more
“…kb , with α f denoting the forgetting factor. Throughout this section, the proposed algorithm used Pr (u k ′ b ′ = 1) = M t /K b , i.e., we assumed all users in neighboring cells were equally likely to be scheduled (see (15)).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm iterates between designing optimal beamforming vectors given the current set of scheduled users, then refining the optimal set of users given the current beamforming vectors; this procedure converges to a stationary point. SLNR-Based Optimization: SLNR-based approaches for resource allocation have garnered some interest [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. The fundamental benefit is that optimizing an SLNR-based function requires only local CSI.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lower bound loosens when the number of users is much greater than the number of antennas, and so they also propose a successive scheduling algorithm, which incrementally schedules the best user given previous scheduling decisions. In [15], a mixed approach is proposed with one half of the users scheduled using the max-lower bound criterion and the other half using successive scheduling. The authors also propose power allocation based on the SLNR computed for each user.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, real-time knowledge of the scheduling variables is not necessary as long as the impact this has on the intercell leakage computation is small. Regardless of how the probabilities are assigned, by relaxing our knowledge of the scheduling variables in neighbouring cells to probabilities, we obtain a decentralized way of evaluating a beam's intercell leakage via (15); thus, BSs are fully decoupled.…”
Section: B Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Linter kb (ν nb ) and Linter kb (ν nb ) are identical to (15) and (20), respectively, except that ν nb is used in the calculation instead of v kb . With the previous equations in mind, VOLUME 4, 2016 we can see that the SLINR for this user can be written as…”
Optimizing the downlink of multi-cell multiuser multiple input multiple output (MU-MIMO) networks has received substantial attention; however, the schemes in the literature consider centralized solutions requiring significant overhead in information exchange (e.g., global channel state information or CSI) and computation load (the need to solve a single large problem). This paper presents a decentralized weighted sum-rate (WSR) maximization algorithm for the multiuser downlink, accounting for beamforming, scheduling, and power allocation. We show that the signal-to-leakage-plus-noise ratio (SLNR) used in previous work suffers from significant drawbacks that limit its potential use in WSR maximization. We address this by proposing a new performance measure, the signal-to-leakage-plusinterference-plus-noise ratio (SLINR), which incorporates intra-cell interference and inter-cell leakage. The SLINR exploits the benefits of the SLNR approach, but by explicitly including interference, avoids many of its flaws. We derive an iterative and decentralized resource allocation approach under imperfect CSI, and our simulation results show that, despite BSs using only local information, the proposed algorithm comes within 3.8% of the throughput achieved by centralized schemes.INDEX TERMS Beamforming, inter-cell interference, leakage, MIMO, SLINR.
I. INTRODUCTION A. BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION
“…kb , with α f denoting the forgetting factor. Throughout this section, the proposed algorithm used Pr (u k ′ b ′ = 1) = M t /K b , i.e., we assumed all users in neighboring cells were equally likely to be scheduled (see (15)).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm iterates between designing optimal beamforming vectors given the current set of scheduled users, then refining the optimal set of users given the current beamforming vectors; this procedure converges to a stationary point. SLNR-Based Optimization: SLNR-based approaches for resource allocation have garnered some interest [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. The fundamental benefit is that optimizing an SLNR-based function requires only local CSI.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lower bound loosens when the number of users is much greater than the number of antennas, and so they also propose a successive scheduling algorithm, which incrementally schedules the best user given previous scheduling decisions. In [15], a mixed approach is proposed with one half of the users scheduled using the max-lower bound criterion and the other half using successive scheduling. The authors also propose power allocation based on the SLNR computed for each user.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, real-time knowledge of the scheduling variables is not necessary as long as the impact this has on the intercell leakage computation is small. Regardless of how the probabilities are assigned, by relaxing our knowledge of the scheduling variables in neighbouring cells to probabilities, we obtain a decentralized way of evaluating a beam's intercell leakage via (15); thus, BSs are fully decoupled.…”
Section: B Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Linter kb (ν nb ) and Linter kb (ν nb ) are identical to (15) and (20), respectively, except that ν nb is used in the calculation instead of v kb . With the previous equations in mind, VOLUME 4, 2016 we can see that the SLINR for this user can be written as…”
Optimizing the downlink of multi-cell multiuser multiple input multiple output (MU-MIMO) networks has received substantial attention; however, the schemes in the literature consider centralized solutions requiring significant overhead in information exchange (e.g., global channel state information or CSI) and computation load (the need to solve a single large problem). This paper presents a decentralized weighted sum-rate (WSR) maximization algorithm for the multiuser downlink, accounting for beamforming, scheduling, and power allocation. We show that the signal-to-leakage-plus-noise ratio (SLNR) used in previous work suffers from significant drawbacks that limit its potential use in WSR maximization. We address this by proposing a new performance measure, the signal-to-leakage-plusinterference-plus-noise ratio (SLINR), which incorporates intra-cell interference and inter-cell leakage. The SLINR exploits the benefits of the SLNR approach, but by explicitly including interference, avoids many of its flaws. We derive an iterative and decentralized resource allocation approach under imperfect CSI, and our simulation results show that, despite BSs using only local information, the proposed algorithm comes within 3.8% of the throughput achieved by centralized schemes.INDEX TERMS Beamforming, inter-cell interference, leakage, MIMO, SLINR.
I. INTRODUCTION A. BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.