2005
DOI: 10.1080/09537280500033213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint replenishment policy in inventory-production systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the transportation charge could be complicated in the real world. For example, the company may offer a price table with all-unit discount, incremental discount or a price table with indifference points, see Russell and Krajewski (1991) and Siajadi et al (2005) for details. We note that it is almost impossible to learn the exact objective function value before one determines the values of the decision variables in the mathematical model.…”
Section: More Complicated Versionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the transportation charge could be complicated in the real world. For example, the company may offer a price table with all-unit discount, incremental discount or a price table with indifference points, see Russell and Krajewski (1991) and Siajadi et al (2005) for details. We note that it is almost impossible to learn the exact objective function value before one determines the values of the decision variables in the mathematical model.…”
Section: More Complicated Versionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khouja (2003) assumed no incentives scheme for coordination. Siajadi, Ibrahim, Lochert, and Chan (2005) presented an integrated inventory system where a manufacturer consumes and purchases raw materials from a supplier in order to produce a specific finished item. They assumed that these defective items can be reworked instantaneously at a cost and kept in stock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They assumed that these defective items can be reworked instantaneously at a cost and kept in stock. Siajadi et al (2005) also assumed a random percentage of defective items per lot, and no incentive scheme for coordination. This paper investigates the work of Khouja (2005), who assumed the number of defectives per lot to be proportional to the lot size, in a centralized model where players in a two-level (manufacturer-retailer) supply chain coordinate their orders to minimize their local costs and that of the chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siajadi et al (2005) analysed scenario is that a single buyer (or a group of buyers), demand(s) a particular type of end/finished item where back-order is not allowed. The delivery of the finished item to the customer is based on multiple small deliveries of equal size, Q, instead of a lot-for-lot basis.…”
Section: Multiple Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%