2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Recommendations for Reporting Carotid Ultrasound Investigations in the United Kingdom

Abstract: At present in the United Kingdom a number of different criteria are used to grade disease in carotid ultrasound investigations. One main cause of this has been the difference in the method of grading angiograms used in the NASCET and ECST large carotid surgery trials. It is desirable that all centres reporting carotid ultrasound investigations report to the same standard. This paper presents recommendations for the reporting of ultrasound investigations of the extra cranial arteries produced by a Joint Working… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
196
0
16

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
196
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Doppler criterion for Ն70% stenosis was a peak systolic velocity of Ͼ230 cm/s. 16,17 Stenosis degree was confirmed by angiography in all cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Doppler criterion for Ն70% stenosis was a peak systolic velocity of Ͼ230 cm/s. 16,17 Stenosis degree was confirmed by angiography in all cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Assessments of extracranial internal carotid arteries on digital subtraction angiography, MRA, and carotid echography were made by North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET)-based methodology. 15 Stenosis in major intracranial arteries on digital subtraction angiography and MRA was evaluated by Warfarin Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID)-style methodology. 16 An AOL was defined as >50% stenosis, or as occlusion of extra-and intracranial large arteries assessed by MRA or digital subtraction angiography without recanalization on the followup examination.…”
Section: Mri Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carotid disease was determined by the degree of stenosis alone without using criteria for velocities, because this was not available in one center. Although velocities are recommended for carotid stenosis assessment, 26 the sensitivity and specificity of duplex alone are fair compared with angiography (72% and 92% for stenosis 80% to 99%, 92% and 99% for complete occlusion). 27 Second, there was some selection bias in the stroke cohort, because severely ill patients were excluded because they could not undergo retinal photography.…”
Section: De Silva Et Al Retinal Vascular Caliber and Carotid Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%