PsycEXTRA Dataset 2013
DOI: 10.1037/e636952013-351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Production: The effect of predicting other's upcoming words on speech production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the picture naming task, pictures related to high-frequency signs elicited a reduced positivity at the 350-550ms time window, in comparison to pictures related to low-frequency signs. These results replicate the polarity obtained in previous picture naming studies in both sign and oral languages (Baus et al, 2014;Baus & Costa, 2015;Qu et al, 2016;Strijkers et al, 2010;Strijkers & Costa, 2011) and the timing reported in picture naming studies in the signed modality (Baus & Costa, 2015). In contrast, ERP frequency effects in the word-to-sign translation task showed a reverse polarity and an earlier onset of the effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the picture naming task, pictures related to high-frequency signs elicited a reduced positivity at the 350-550ms time window, in comparison to pictures related to low-frequency signs. These results replicate the polarity obtained in previous picture naming studies in both sign and oral languages (Baus et al, 2014;Baus & Costa, 2015;Qu et al, 2016;Strijkers et al, 2010;Strijkers & Costa, 2011) and the timing reported in picture naming studies in the signed modality (Baus & Costa, 2015). In contrast, ERP frequency effects in the word-to-sign translation task showed a reverse polarity and an earlier onset of the effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the picture naming task, pictures related to highfrequency signs elicited a reduced positivity at the 350-550ms time window, in comparison to pictures related to low-frequency signs. These results replicate the polarity obtained in previous picture naming studies in both sign and oral languages (Baus et al, 2014;Baus & Costa, 2015;Qu et al, 2016;Strijkers et al, 2010;Strijkers & Costa, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%