2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint price and quality decisions considering Chinese customers' variety seeking behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Sajeesh and Raju (2010), Niu, et al (2019) examined jointed pricing and quality decisions considering customers' variety-seeking behavior. They found that the existence of variety-seeking customers reduced firms' incentives to improve quality levels [21]. Our research is different from the above works in that we involved the service level decision with the pricing strategy between traditional products and sharing products.…”
Section: Variety-seeking Behaviormentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Unlike Sajeesh and Raju (2010), Niu, et al (2019) examined jointed pricing and quality decisions considering customers' variety-seeking behavior. They found that the existence of variety-seeking customers reduced firms' incentives to improve quality levels [21]. Our research is different from the above works in that we involved the service level decision with the pricing strategy between traditional products and sharing products.…”
Section: Variety-seeking Behaviormentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, Lin and Kuo (2019) attached more emphasis to the impacts on the interaction between product temperature and its ambient temperature on product seeking behavior. Niu et al (2019) perceived the variety-seeking behavior of consumers led to the mild competition in the first stage and fierce competition in the second, while the existence of this behavior would weaken the motivation of enterprises to improve their quality levels. In this paper, Niu's study is a reference but what distinguishes our study from theirs lies in the fact that the operation scenario of CB and PT is taken as the research target.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent progress in behavioral economics shows the importance of incorporating various psychological insights into firms' decision models. Examples include consumers' "buying frenzy" behavior (DeGraba, 1995;Courty and Nasiry, 2016), fairness concerns (Cui et al, 2007;Nie and Du, 2017), reference effects (Kopalle et al, 1996;Zha et al, 2021;Zhao et al, 2021), consumers' contextdependent preferences (Chen and Turut, 2013), and consumers' variety-seeking behavior (Sajeesh and Raju, 2010;Niu et al, 2019). Among these insights, pricing strategies for conspicuous goods in the presence of the snob effect has received much scholarly attention since the seminal paper of Leibenstein (1950) who formally introduced the snob effect as a negative consumption externality by which product scarcity increases consumer utility.…”
Section: Pricing In the Presence Of Snob Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, our contribution to the related literature is to theoretically clarify at which periods and how long firms should cause product shortages strategically in the presence of the snob effect. Because our motivating examples include both durable and nondurable goods, the durability of the good does not matter in our model, as in Gabszewicz and Garcia (2008), Hashimoto and Matsubayashi (2014), Zhou et al (2015), Liu et al (2018), Zha et al (2021), andNiu et al (2019). In addition, as our central focus is on analytically finding the optimal paths of price and sales quantity over more than two periods, we employ a simple deterministic setting with linear demand and cost, which is consistent with the models in most of the abovementioned studies on pricing strategies in the presence of the snob effect.…”
Section: General Multiple-period Pricing In the Presence Of Snob Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%