IEEE 6th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/mmsp.2004.1436432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint optimization of scale factors and huffman code books for MPEG-4 AAC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection of SFs and HCBs in the encoder is done to minimize the perceptual distortion, given as maximum over SFBs of quantization noise to masking threshold ratio (MNMR), (1) where the masking threshold, , is provided by a psychoacoustic model. Since the standard only dictates the bitstream syntax and the decoder part of the codec, numerous techniques to optimize the encoder parameters have been proposed (e.g., [1], [14]- [17]). Specifically, the MPEG AAC verification model (publicly available as informative part of the MPEG standard) optimizes the encoder parameters via a low-complexity technique known as the two-loop search (TLS) [1], [14].…”
Section: B Mpeg Aacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of SFs and HCBs in the encoder is done to minimize the perceptual distortion, given as maximum over SFBs of quantization noise to masking threshold ratio (MNMR), (1) where the masking threshold, , is provided by a psychoacoustic model. Since the standard only dictates the bitstream syntax and the decoder part of the codec, numerous techniques to optimize the encoder parameters have been proposed (e.g., [1], [14]- [17]). Specifically, the MPEG AAC verification model (publicly available as informative part of the MPEG standard) optimizes the encoder parameters via a low-complexity technique known as the two-loop search (TLS) [1], [14].…”
Section: B Mpeg Aacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize again that this reference is in itself an improvement over existing scalable encoders that employ suboptimal techniques. As an aside, note that the mixed integer linear programming-based approach proposed in [13] can serve as an alternative to the intra-frame trellis of [7].…”
Section: A Independent Optimization Of Layers In Scalable Aacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low-complexity sub-optimal alternative was proposed in [12]. A mixed integer linear programming-based solution to the same problem was proposed by Bauer and Vinton in [13]. The approach in [7] was extended in [8] to incorporate delayed decisions, i.e., optimizing decisions over multiple frames.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], two algorithms that determine the optimal choice of the SF and HCB for a given configuration in the AN M R problem are proposed. They are based on a mixed integer linear and a dynamic programming solution, respectively.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the definition of the variables Z g,i,a,b and eg,i,m, one sees that the definition of the objective function in (9) corresponds to the definition of the objective function in (2).…”
Section: Milp Formulation For the An M R Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%