2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06554-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint optic disc and cup segmentation based on multi-scale feature analysis and attention pyramid architecture for glaucoma screening

Abstract: Automatic segmentation of optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) is an essential task for analysing colour fundus images. In clinical practice, accurate OD and OC segmentation assist ophthalmologists in diagnosing glaucoma. In this paper, we propose a unified convolutional neural network, named ResFPN-Net, which learns the boundary feature and the inner relation between OD and OC for automatic segmentation. The proposed ResFPN-Net is mainly composed of multi-scale feature extractor, multi-scale segmentation transi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RMSDSC-Net outperforms the recent results by Almubarak et al 32 in DC for OC and OD by (1.5%, 5.5%) on the REFUGE database and Hervella et al 46 in DC for OC and OD by (1.8%, 1.7%) on the DRISHTI-GS database. Finally, we have compared the results with the latest papers from Haider et al, 43 Sun et al, 47 and Hervella et al 48 The proposed approach outperforms the earlier best results by Sun et al 47 on OC DC by around 2.1%. Also, it performs better than the recent best results by Hervella et al 48 and Adnan et al 43 on OC DC on the DRISHTI-GS and REGUFE databases.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With The State-of-the-art Approachesmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RMSDSC-Net outperforms the recent results by Almubarak et al 32 in DC for OC and OD by (1.5%, 5.5%) on the REFUGE database and Hervella et al 46 in DC for OC and OD by (1.8%, 1.7%) on the DRISHTI-GS database. Finally, we have compared the results with the latest papers from Haider et al, 43 Sun et al, 47 and Hervella et al 48 The proposed approach outperforms the earlier best results by Sun et al 47 on OC DC by around 2.1%. Also, it performs better than the recent best results by Hervella et al 48 and Adnan et al 43 on OC DC on the DRISHTI-GS and REGUFE databases.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With The State-of-the-art Approachesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach, we compare our approach with the state‐of‐the‐art approaches, including U‐Net, 24 M‐Net, 25 FC‐DenseNet, 26 pOSAL, 29 Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), 30 Two‐stage Mask R‐CNN, 32 Team BUCT, 41 Stack‐U‐Net, 44 Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network (WGAN), 45 Multimodal, 46 ResFPN‐Net, 47 M‐Ada, 48 and SLSR‐Net 43 . Tables 7 and 8 depict the OD and OC segmentation results for different approaches on the DRISHTI‐GS and REFUGE databases, respectively.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we compare the proposed approach with the state-of-the-art approaches, including UNet ( Ronneberger et al, 2015 ), FC-DenseNet ( Al-Bander et al, 2018 ), Yu et al (2019) , WRoIM ( Shah et al, 2019 ), M-Net ( Fu et al, 2018 ), WGAN ( Kadambi et al, 2020 ), pOSAL ( Wang et al, 2019 ), GL-Net ( Jiang et al, 2019 ), CFEA ( Liu et al, 2019 ), Multi-model ( Hervella et al, 2020 ), Two-stage Mask R-CNN ( Almubarak et al, 2020 ), ResFPN-Net ( Sun et al, 2021 ) and M-Ada ( Hervella et al, 2022 ). Table 4 illustrate the OD and OC segmentation results of different approaches on the Drishti-GS and REFUGE datasets, respectively.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed from Table 4 , our approach achieves the best performance in terms of all the evaluation metrics on the two datasets. Finally, the proposed approach is compared with the latest deep learning approaches, i.e., Multi-model ( Hervella et al, 2020 ), Two-stage Mask R-CNN ( Almubarak et al, 2020 ), ResFPN-Net ( Sun et al, 2021 ) and M-Ada ( Hervella et al, 2022 ). According to the results, we can learn that the OD segmentation performance of our approach is slightly lower than ResFPN-Net by 0.0018 (DC) on the Drishti-GS dataset and is inferior to M-Ada by 0.0036 (DC) on the REFUGE dataset.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This architectural improvement leads to a new diffusion-based medical image segmentation method called MedSegDiff-V2 [ 28 ]. Sun et al used ResFPN-Net to learn the boundary features and the inner relation between OD and OC for automatic segmentation [ 29 ]. Xue et al used hybrid level set modeling for disc segmentation [ 30 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%