2019
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2019.2929833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Motion Classification and Person Identification via Multitask Learning for Smart Homes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The security and privacy of data captured by sensors [ 103 , 104 ], the durability of power supplies (batteries) [ 91 , 105 ], the resilience of communications [ 105 , 106 ], and the intrusiveness of sensors [ 103 , 107 ], among other NFRs, must be considered at each stage of an IoTS development. Therefore, for example, there are research lines on different methods, protocols, and guidelines to guarantee data security and privacy [ 30 , 108 , 109 , 110 ], low energy consumption [ 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 ], or to integrate sensors with different levels of intrusiveness [ 114 , 115 ], among others.…”
Section: Methodologies Designed For the Development Of Iotssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The security and privacy of data captured by sensors [ 103 , 104 ], the durability of power supplies (batteries) [ 91 , 105 ], the resilience of communications [ 105 , 106 ], and the intrusiveness of sensors [ 103 , 107 ], among other NFRs, must be considered at each stage of an IoTS development. Therefore, for example, there are research lines on different methods, protocols, and guidelines to guarantee data security and privacy [ 30 , 108 , 109 , 110 ], low energy consumption [ 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 ], or to integrate sensors with different levels of intrusiveness [ 114 , 115 ], among others.…”
Section: Methodologies Designed For the Development Of Iotssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithms include conventional machine learning based on feature engineering combined with appropriate classifiers, such as support vector machines (SVM), decision trees (DT), random forest (RF), and empowerment methods. They also include automatic feature learning such as deep learning (e.g., deep belief networks (DBN), autoencoder (AE), convolutional neural networks (CNN), recurrent neural networks (RNN), generative antagonist networks (GAN)) (Lang et al, 2019). In general, it is now recognized that a higher degree of automation improves radar environmental awareness, irrespective of the type of application considered.…”
Section: Machine Learning For Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern high-resolution radars, equipped with advanced signal processing algorithms, have a better capability to extract micro-Doppler features, which allow classical problems such as non-cooperative target detection and classification to be solved in a more efficient way (Clemente et al, 2015;Ritchie et al, 2016;Fioranelli et al, 2020). This also paves the way for new applications, such as human activity monitoring (Amin, 2017;Shrestha et al, 2020), urban and indoor surveillance (Pastina et al, 2015;Seyfioglu et al, 2018), healthcare (Li et al, 2018a;Lang et al, 2019;Seifert et al, 2019), automotive applications (Khomchuk et al, 2016;Duggal et al, 2020), and manufacturing (Zeintl et al, 2019;Izzo et al, 2020). A recent book (Fioranelli et al, 2020) covered the latest developments in radar micro-Doppler signatures and noncooperative recognition of moving targets and identified a number of ongoing research areas, among which passive radar approaches for healthcare, multimodal sensing for assisted living using radar, small drones and bird signatures extraction, and micro-Doppler signature extraction and analysis for automotive application were mentioned.…”
Section: Micro-doppler Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for both of the tasks, MRA-Net converges slightly slower than the other baselines, which is probably due to the parameter optimization complexity caused by MTL. Subsequently, we compared the proposed MRA-Net with another MTL network, JMI-CNN [32], for the person identification and activity classification tasks. Additionally, to more comprehensively compare the two networks, Gaussian white noise (GWN) with different signal noise ratios (SNRs) was added on the MD signatures of the dataset.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%