2013
DOI: 10.1162/tacl_a_00238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Morphological and Syntactic Analysis for Richly Inflected Languages

Abstract: Joint morphological and syntactic analysis has been proposed as a way of improving parsing accuracy for richly inflected languages. Starting from a transition-based model for joint part-of-speech tagging and dependency parsing, we explore different ways of integrating morphological features into the model. We also investigate the use of rule-based morphological analyzers to provide hard or soft lexical constraints and the use of word clusters to tackle the sparsity of lexical features. Evaluation on five morph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preparatory for all modules is the natural language processing of the input text corpora. To this end, we utilize the NLP tool chain of TextImager [63] to carry out tokenization, sentence spli ing, part of speech tagging, lemmatization, morphological tagging, named entity recognition, dependency parsing [17] and automatic disambiguation -the la er by means of fastSense [137]. For more details on these submodules see [36,137].…”
Section: Module 1: Natural Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparatory for all modules is the natural language processing of the input text corpora. To this end, we utilize the NLP tool chain of TextImager [63] to carry out tokenization, sentence spli ing, part of speech tagging, lemmatization, morphological tagging, named entity recognition, dependency parsing [17] and automatic disambiguation -the la er by means of fastSense [137]. For more details on these submodules see [36,137].…”
Section: Module 1: Natural Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for joint morphological disambiguation and parsing have been widely explored Tsarfaty (2006;Cohen and Smith (2007;Goldberg and Tsarfaty (2008;Goldberg and Elhadad (2011). More recently, Bohnet et al (2013) presented an arc-standard transition-based parser that performs competitively for joint morphological tagging and dependency parsing for richly inflected languages, such as Czech, Finnish, German, Hungarian, and Russian. Our model seeks to achieve a similar benefit to parsing without explicitly reasoning about the internal structure of words.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stanford CoreNLP tools (Manning et al, 2014) are used for tokenisations and POS-tagging of the input. Using a shallow parser (Bohnet et al, 2013) we obtain the dependency relations for the sentences. Our ASP representation contains atoms of the following form: pos (c_NNP, 1 ) .…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%