2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint moment contributions to swing knee extension acceleration during gait in individuals with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed estimation methods would not be as accurate as the comprehensive gait analysis using the 3-D musculoskeletal model, which has allowed researchers to simulate the roles and the capacities of the lower limb muscles in individuals with CP [27]–[30]. The estimation gains might not hold across non-weight bearing tasks and weight bearing tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed estimation methods would not be as accurate as the comprehensive gait analysis using the 3-D musculoskeletal model, which has allowed researchers to simulate the roles and the capacities of the lower limb muscles in individuals with CP [27]–[30]. The estimation gains might not hold across non-weight bearing tasks and weight bearing tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard gait analysis methods using joint kinematics and sEMG have been used to estimate the joint moment of the lower limb in individuals with TD [23]–[26] and CP [27]–[30]. Delp et al analyzed joint moment and muscle contributions during TD [25] and CP [28]–[30] gait cycles using a 3-D musculoskeletal model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified COSMIN scores of three of these eight SCALE papers were 'good', [37][38][39] four were rated as 'fair', [40][41][42] one as 'excellent', 43 and one as 'poor'. The modified COSMIN scores of three of these eight SCALE papers were 'good', [37][38][39] four were rated as 'fair', [40][41][42] one as 'excellent', 43 and one as 'poor'.…”
Section: Hypotheses Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,43 A 'limited positive (+)' evidence level was given for its validity testing with the Berg Balance Scale, 45 and for predicting knee flexion during initial contact during stance phase of gait. [39][40][41] Therefore, their level of evidence was rated as 'conflicting (AE)'. Two studies found significant correlations and one did not.…”
Section: Hypotheses Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation