The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/92.3.587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint modelling of accelerated failure time and longitudinal data

Abstract: The accelerated failure time (AFT) model is an attractive alternative to the Cox model when the proportionality assumption fails to capture the relation between the survival time and longitudinal covariates. Several complications arise when the covariates are measured intermittently at different time points for different subjects, possibly with measurement errors, or measurements are not available after the failure time. Joint modelling of the failure time and longitudinal data offers a solution to such compli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For such situations other models need to be used. Tseng et al [26] used an accelerated failure time survival model as an alternative to the Cox model with longitudinal covariates following a linear mixed-effects model with measurement errors. Song and Huang [27] used a joint longitudinal-survival model with an additive hazard, where timedependent covariates measured with errors are added to the baseline hazard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such situations other models need to be used. Tseng et al [26] used an accelerated failure time survival model as an alternative to the Cox model with longitudinal covariates following a linear mixed-effects model with measurement errors. Song and Huang [27] used a joint longitudinal-survival model with an additive hazard, where timedependent covariates measured with errors are added to the baseline hazard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint modelling of the two different types of endpoints simultaneously has received considerable attention in recent years [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Tsiatis and Davidian provided a nice overview of joint models [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fourth advantage of joint modelling stems from scientific investigations such as AIDS studies, in which the interest is to characterize the relationship between CD4 count and the time to AIDS. One common procedure is that the true underlying trajectory of the CD4 count can be first modelled, and then be incorporated into a Cox model for the time to AIDS [14,15], or into an accelerated failure time model in other applications if the proportional hazards assumption fails [16]. Non-likelihood-based approaches include the work of Robins and his colleagues [22][23][24] who used augmented inverse probability of censoring weighted estimating equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific steps of the EM-algorithm to arrive at the parameter estimates are described in detail in Tseng et al (2005).…”
Section: Joint Models With Focus On Event Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%